Doing critical disciplinary literacies in teacher education: A pedagogical framework

African Journal of Teacher Education and Development

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Doing critical disciplinary literacies in teacher education: A pedagogical framework
 
Creator Govender, Navan Salehjee, Saima Van der Merwe, Clinton D.
 
Subject English; Geography; Science critical literacy; disciplinary literacy; content-area literacy; science literacy; geography literacy
Description Background: This article explores the possibilities for conceptualising and doing critical disciplinary literacies (CDL) in (teacher) education.Aim: By revisiting and adapting Luke and Freebody’s four resources model, we consider the critical questions that teachers and teacher educators could ask about knowledge, practice, and text and/or representation within different disciplines.Setting: Our use of the word ‘critical’ in CDL is therefore underpinned by traditions of critical literacies in which power and identity are fundamental to participating in disciplinary fields.Methods: Using two cases as illustrative examples of CDL in context, one from science education and one from geography education, we demonstrate how our CDL model reveals possibilities for doing critical literacies across the curriculum and with disciplinary content knowledge and practice.Results: Each case illustrates the pedagogical utility of the CDL framework for: (1) relating the disciplines to students’ lives and (2) demystifying the processes of producing disciplinary texts.Conclusion: We end with a call to action for student teachers, teachers, and teacher educators to explore the pedagogical utility of our CDL model by identifying the dominant texts of their (inter/trans) disciplinary work, interrogating the privileged sign systems as well as assumptions about imagined audiences of disciplinary texts, and (re) designing text and practice by drawing on multiple sources and approaches to representing knowledge and engaging in social action.Contribution: In this article, we build on scholarship in critical literacies, disciplinary literacies, and teacher education by adapting and applying Luke and Freebody’s four resources model to different disciplinary texts and practices, with implications for pedagogy at school and higher education contexts.
 
Publisher AOSIS Publishing
 
Contributor
Date 2024-06-28
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/ajoted.v3i1.41
 
Source African Journal of Teacher Education and Development; Vol 3, No 1 (2024); 11 pages 2958-0986 2958-8650
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://ajoted.org/index.php/ajoted/article/view/41/157 https://ajoted.org/index.php/ajoted/article/view/41/158 https://ajoted.org/index.php/ajoted/article/view/41/159 https://ajoted.org/index.php/ajoted/article/view/41/160
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2024 Navan Govender, Saima Salehjee, Clinton David van der Merwe https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT