Neuromyths in Industrial and Organisational Psychology in South Africa: Prevalence and impact

SA Journal of Industrial Psychology

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Neuromyths in Industrial and Organisational Psychology in South Africa: Prevalence and impact
 
Creator du Buisson-Narsai, Ingra Fisher, Talia Morris, Andrew van Lill, Xander
 
Subject organisational behaviour organisational neuroscience; neuromyths; applied neuroscience; neuroeducation; organisational psychology.
Description Orientation: Industrial Psychologists (IPs) could significantly benefit from integrating neuroscientific evidence into their practices, provided they critically engage with scholarly research rather than rely on unsupported assertions.Research purpose: The study aimed to assess the prevalence of neuroscientific misconceptions among IPs, student psychologists, and intern psychologists in South Africa as well as advocate for enhanced foundational knowledge in applied organisational neuroscience within industrial psychology.Motivation for the study: The emerging field of organisational neuroscience, which applies brain science to workplace behaviour, is particularly vulnerable to misconceptions that could hinder its development.Research approach/design and method: Using a cross-sectional survey, this research evaluated the knowledge of neuro misconceptions at one point in time within a convenience sample of (n = 98), consisting of registered student psychologists (n = 7; 7%), intern psychologists (n = 8; 10%), and IPs (n = 83; 85%).Main findings: Results indicated that this sample endorses many neuromyth conceptions. There was significant disparity in the endorsement of misconceptions between those with and without neuroscientific training, highlighting a knowledge gap.Practical/managerial implications: These findings underscore the necessity for improved education in applied organisational neuroscience among IOPs, suggesting integration into training and education programs.Contribution/value-add: This pioneering study in South Africa emphasises the role of general knowledge, specific training in applied organisational neuroscience, and critical thinking in psychological research as key to combating neuromyths, marking a meaningful contribution to the field.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2024-03-29
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Opinion Paper
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajip.v50i0.2097
 
Source SA Journal of Industrial Psychology; Vol 50 (2024); 6 pages 2071-0763 0258-5200
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/2097/3881 https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/2097/3882 https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/2097/3883 https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/2097/3884
 
Coverage — — Industrial Psychology students
Rights Copyright (c) 2024 Ingra du Buisson-Narsai, Talia Fisher, Andrew Morris, Xander van Lill https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT