Education Development Officers as agents for promoting quality education at selected rural schools

African Journal of Teacher Education and Development

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Education Development Officers as agents for promoting quality education at selected rural schools
 
Creator Mbande – Kwayini, Busisiwe G. Rulashe, Tando Ramolobe, Kutu S.
 
Subject Public Administration; Public Management; Education quality teaching and learning; education development officers; circuit managers; schools; education.
Description Background: The quality of teaching and learning (TL) has been a concern in South Africa and has received attention from global players such as the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the agenda of the Education for All (EFA) policy. In South Africa, quality teaching and learning (QTL) in secondary schools remains low and compromised despite the implementation of the EFA policy and the use of education development officers (EDOs).Aim: The study sought to investigate the effectiveness of EDOs in promoting QTL at selected schools in the King Williams Town (KWT) district.Setting: The units of analysis are selected schools in the KWT district in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa.Methods: The study employed an interpretivism paradigm with a case study design and a qualitative approach to investigate the role of Education Development Officers (EDOs) in supporting QTL in selected secondary schools in the King Williams Town (KWT) District, while the data was interpreted thematically from the ten participants.Results: Education development officers play a critical role in enabling School Management Teams in South Africa to achieve high-QTL. However, EDOs face a number of challenges such as a lack of human and material resources, teacher resistance, extracurricular activities, student and teacher absenteeism, programme alignment, and work overload.Conclusion: The major conclusion of the study indicates that the challenges faced by EDOs can be overcome by employing four main strategies: stakeholder engagement, leadership, monitoring and evaluation, and training.Contribution: This article has the potential to contribute to theory, concept, policy, and practice regarding the promotion of QTL in schools.
 
Publisher AOSIS Publishing
 
Contributor
Date 2024-01-22
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/ajoted.v3i1.30
 
Source African Journal of Teacher Education and Development; Vol 3, No 1 (2024); 9 pages 2958-0986 2958-8650
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://ajoted.org/index.php/ajoted/article/view/30/113 https://ajoted.org/index.php/ajoted/article/view/30/114 https://ajoted.org/index.php/ajoted/article/view/30/115 https://ajoted.org/index.php/ajoted/article/view/30/116
 
Coverage King Williams Town Eastern Cape South Africa — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2024 Busisiwe G. Mbande – Kwayini, Tando Rulashe, Kutu S. Ramolobe https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT