Investigating the interpretation and implementation of policies that guide the teaching of reading in the Foundation Phase

Reading & Writing

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Investigating the interpretation and implementation of policies that guide the teaching of reading in the Foundation Phase
 
Creator Marais, Ann-May Wessels, Elsabé
 
Subject Education Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement; English Home Language curriculum; interpretation; implementation; policy; reading policies; reading; teaching reading; Foundation Phase.
Description Background: There is growing international awareness of the dividends of early reading success and the consequences of early reading failure. Many studies have shown that the educational achievement of South African learners is unacceptably poor. There are shortcomings in the curriculum for English home language (EHL) which could be the reason for educators’ uncertainties and frustration with the teaching of reading.Objectives: To identify policies that guide the teaching of reading and to investigate the management of their interpretation and implementation.Method: A qualitative case study design was employed, underpinned by the sense-making theory which was used as a theoretical framework. Three primary schools in the Lichtenburg circuit were selected as study sites. Participants were selected purposively and data generation methods included document analysis, observations and interviews. Inductive data analysis was applied through the identification of patterns, categories and themes.Results: The results indicate that the EHL curriculum document is the only policy document that teachers in this study used as a guideline for the teaching of reading in the Foundation Phase. However, this document lacks explicit guidance on how reading should be taught.Conclusion: The main policy that guides the teaching of reading in the Foundation Phase is the EHL curriculum. However, participants do not always understand the stipulations of this document and make partial use of the guidelines because they do not know how to interpret them. The curriculum lacks step-by-step guidelines on teaching activities for reading. Thus, we suggest that professional development should be based on the needs of the educators.
 
Publisher AOSIS Publishing
 
Contributor
Date 2020-11-27
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Qualitative
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/rw.v11i1.277
 
Source Reading & Writing; Vol 11, No 1 (2020); 8 pages 2308-1422 2079-8245
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://rw.org.za/index.php/rw/article/view/277/684 https://rw.org.za/index.php/rw/article/view/277/685 https://rw.org.za/index.php/rw/article/view/277/686 https://rw.org.za/index.php/rw/article/view/277/683
 
Coverage — — Educator/teachers from Primary schools
Rights Copyright (c) 2020 Ann-May Marais, Elsabé Wessels https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT