Strengths use, deficit correction, thriving and performance of academics at universities of technology

SA Journal of Industrial Psychology

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Strengths use, deficit correction, thriving and performance of academics at universities of technology
 
Creator Mahomed, Fathima E. Rothmann, Sebastiaan
 
Subject organisational behaviour strengths use; deficit correction; well-being; academics; thriving; performance; contextual performance; task performance
Description Orientation: Research regarding strengths use, deficit correction and thriving of academics in higher education institutions is necessary, given the possible effects thereof on their task and contextual performance.Research purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationships among strengths use and deficit correction, thriving at work and performance of academics. Furthermore, it sought to investigate whether performance-related pay moderates the effects of thriving on performance.Motivation for the study: No studies were found regarding the relationships among a balanced strengths- and deficit-based approach, thriving at work, and performance in the context of South African higher education.Research approach/design and method: A cross-sectional survey design was used, with a convenience sample of 276 academic employees from three universities of technology in South Africa. The participants completed the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction Scale, the Thriving at Work Scale, a scale that measured perceptions of performance-related pay and measures of task and contextual performance.Main findings: The results showed that perceived organisational support for strengths use, as well as individual strengths use and deficit correction, predicted thriving at work. Thriving predicted task and contextual performance. A significant interaction was found between thriving and perceptions of performance-related pay. The most robust relation between thriving and performance existed when performance-related pay was perceived to be good.Practical/managerial implications: Higher education institutions must invest resources to enable academics to thrive at work via the balanced strength- and deficit-based approach. This approach should be seen as a core development tool for academics to increase employees’ thriving at work.Contribution/value-add: This study contributes to scientific knowledge regarding strengths use and deficit correction, thriving and performance of academics in higher education institutions. It also resulted in new knowledge regarding the interaction effects of performance-related pay and thriving on task performance of academics.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2019-03-19
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Survey
Format text/html application/epub+zip application/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1577
 
Source SA Journal of Industrial Psychology; Vol 45 (2019); 10 pages 2071-0763 0258-5200
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/1577/2376 https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/1577/2375 https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/1577/2377 https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/1577/2374
 
Coverage Gauteng 2017 males 44,6% females 54.4%; mean age 43.83
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Fathima E. Mahomed, Sebastiaan Rothmann https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT