Politicisation of performance appraisals

SA Journal of Human Resource Management

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Politicisation of performance appraisals
 
Creator Swanepoel, Sonia Botha, Petrus A. Mangonyane, Nancy B.
 
Subject human resource management Performance appraisals; Politics; Employee productivity; Human resource management; Performance
Description Orientation: Employees are a source of competitive advantage for organisations and human resource management seek to promote employee efficiency. One of the tools organisations utilise to achieve this goal is performance appraisals.Research purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the weaknesses in performance appraisal and to determine whether it is politicised in the North West Department of Health and Social Development in South Africa.Motivation for study: Many organisations either ignore the existence of politics in the appraisal process or assume that its impact can be minimised if they refine their appraisal instruments. Executives admit that, in appraising others, they often intentionally avoid meeting the goal of accuracy in favour of achieving goals that have more to do with exercising discretion and maintaining departmental effectiveness. Ironically, these same executives lament that the appraisals they receive often do not accurately represent their abilities and performance (Gioia Longenecker, 1994).Research approach, design and method: Self-administered questionnaires were used as a means of collecting data and analysis was done through the use of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).Main findings: The results of the study showed that respondents believe that performance appraisals are highly politicised.Practical/managerial implications: If used effectively, performance appraisals may improve employee productivity and efficiency as well as motivation and performance. However, if performance appraisal is perceived as unfair and political, it can diminish rather than enhance employee attitudes and performance.Contribution: Amongst others, it is recommended that managers should consider separating assessment for development and assessment for rewards.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2014-03-12
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Questionnaire, statistical analysis
Format text/html application/octet-stream text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajhrm.v12i1.525
 
Source SA Journal of Human Resource Management; Vol 12, No 1 (2014); 9 pages 2071-078X 1683-7584
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/525/719 https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/525/720 https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/525/721 https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/525/718
 
Coverage — — Age, gender, quaifications, job title
Rights Copyright (c) 2014 Sonia Swanepoel, Petrus A. Botha, Nancy B. Mangonyane https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT