Implementation of the World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation

African Journal of Laboratory Medicine

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Implementation of the World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation
 
Creator Ndihokubwayo, Jean-Bosco Maruta, Talkmore Ndlovu, Nqobile Moyo, Sikhulile Yahaya, Ali Ahmed Coulibaly, Sheick Oumar Kasolo, Francis Turgeon, David Abrol, Angelii P.
 
Subject — WHO/AFRO; Strengthening Laboratory Quality Improvement Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA); auditors; laboratory audit; ISO 15189; SLIPTA focal person; African Society for Laboratory Medicine; quality management systems; accreditation preparedness
Description Background: The increase in disease burden has continued to weigh upon health systems in Africa. The role of the laboratory has become increasingly critical in the improvement of health for diagnosis, management and treatment of diseases. In response, the World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (WHO AFRO) and its partners created the WHO AFRO Stepwise Laboratory (Quality) Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) program.SLIPTA implementation process: WHO AFRO defined a governance structure with roles and responsibilities for six main stakeholders. Laboratories were evaluated by auditors trained and certified by the African Society for Laboratory Medicine. Laboratory performance was measured using the WHO AFRO SLIPTA scoring checklist and recognition certificates rated with 1–5 stars were issued.Preliminary results: By March 2015, 27 of the 47 (57%) WHO AFRO member states had appointed a SLIPTA focal point and 14 Ministers of Health had endorsed SLIPTA as the desired programme for continuous quality improvement. Ninety-eight auditors from 17 African countries, competent in the Portuguese (3), French (12) and English (83) languages, were trained and certified. The mean score for the 159 laboratories audited between May 2013 and March 2015 was 69% (median 70%; SD 11.5; interquartile range 62–77). Of these audited laboratories, 70% achieved 55% compliance or higher (2 or more stars) and 1% scored at least 95% (5 stars). The lowest scoring sections of the WHO AFRO SLIPTA checklist were sections 6 (Internal Audit) and 10 (Corrective Action), which both had mean scores below 50%.Conclusion: The WHO AFRO SLIPTA is a process that countries with limited resources can adopt for effective implementation of quality management systems. Political commitment, ownership and investment in continuous quality improvement are integral components of the process.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2016-05-20
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/octet-stream text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/ajlm.v5i1.280
 
Source African Journal of Laboratory Medicine; Vol 5, No 1 (2016); 8 pages 2225-2010 2225-2002
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/280/489 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/280/491 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/280/492 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/280/485
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2016 Jean-Bosco Ndihokubwayo, Talkmore Maruta, Nqobile Ndlovu, Sikhulile Moyo, Ali Ahmed Yahaya, Sheick Oumar Coulibaly, Francis Kasolo, David Turgeon, Angelii P. Abrol https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT