Creating a sustainable culture of quality through the SLMTA programme in a district hospital laboratory in Kenya

African Journal of Laboratory Medicine

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Creating a sustainable culture of quality through the SLMTA programme in a district hospital laboratory in Kenya
 
Creator Maruti, Phidelis M. Mulianga, Ekesa A. Wambani, Lorna N. Wafula, Melda N. Mambo, Fidelis A. Mutisya, Shadrack M. Wakaria, Eric N. Mbati, Erick M. Amayo, Angela A. Majani, Jonathan M. Nyary, Bryan Songwe, Kilian A.
 
Subject — —
Description Background: Bungoma District Hospital Laboratory (BDHL), which supports a 200-bed referral facility, began its Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) journey in 2011 together with eight other laboratories in the second round of SLMTA rollout in Kenya.Objectives: To describe how the SLMTA programme and enhanced quality interventions changed the culture and management style at BDHL and instilled a quality system designed to sustain progress for years to come.Methods: SLMTA implementation followed the standard three-workshop series, mentorship site visits and audits. In order to build sustainability of progress, BDHL integrated quality improvement processes into its daily operations. The lab undertook a process of changing its internal culture to align all hospital stakeholders – including upper management, clinicians, laboratory staff and maintenance staff – to the mission of sustainable quality practices at BDHL.Results: After 16 months in the SLMTA programme, BDHL improved from zero stars (38%) to four stars (89%). Over a period of two to three years, external quality assessment results improved from 47% to 87%; staff punctuality increased from 49% to 82%; clinician complaints decreased from 83% to 16; rejection rates decreased from 12% to 3%; and annual equipment repairs decreased from 40 to 15. Twelve months later the laboratory scored three stars (81%) in an external surveillance audit conducted by Kenya Accreditation Service (KENAS).Conclusion: Management buy-in, staff participation, use of progress-monitoring tools and feedback systems, as well as incorporation of improvement processes into routine daily activities, were vital in developing and sustaining a culture of quality improvement.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2014-09-16
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/octet-stream text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/ajlm.v3i2.201
 
Source African Journal of Laboratory Medicine; Vol 3, No 2 (2014); 5 pages 2225-2010 2225-2002
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/201/195 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/201/196 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/201/197 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/201/183
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2014 Phidelis M. Maruti, Ekesa A. Mulianga, Lorna N. Wambani, Melda N. Wafula, Fidelis A. Mambo, Shadrack M. Mutisya, Eric N. Wakaria, Erick M. Mbati, Angela A. Amayo, Jonathan M. Majani, Bryan Nyary, Kilian A. Songwe https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT