Record Details

Use of physical restraint in hospital patients: A descriptive study in a tertiary hospital in South Africa

Curationis

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Use of physical restraint in hospital patients: A descriptive study in a tertiary hospital in South Africa
 
Creator Kalula, Sebastiana Z. Petros, Sabela G.
 
Subject Medicine Physical restraint; Complications; Acute care; Health care professionals
Description Background: The use of physical restraint in patient management is a common and emotive issue, and has legal and ethical dimensions.Objective: To document the prevalence of physical restraint use, patient characteristics associated with physical restraint use, and nurses’ and doctors’ knowledge and perceptions towards the practice.Methods: A cross-sectional study of 572 patients, of whom 132 were physically restrained, was conducted in acute wards of a tertiary hospital. Data were collected on the 132 physically restrained patients. Fifty-nine doctors and 159 nurses completed a specially constructed questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were derived and expressed as numbers and percentages.Results: Prevalence of restraint use was 23% (132/572). The distribution in acute wards was: medical 54.5%; surgical 44.7%; maternity 0.8%; psychiatry none. Mean age (SD) of the restrained patients was 49 years (20.5); 53.8% were male. The commonest types of restraints used were bed rails 93% and wrist belts 12%. Restraints were used largely to protect medical devices and as protection from harm. Less than 15% of the nurses reported having received training and 36% of the doctors reported having received some guidance on the use of restraints. Only a minority of nurses and doctors knew of a hospital policy on restraint use. Documentation on the prescription and indication for the use of restraint was poor.Conclusion: Prevalence of restraint use is high and poorly coordinated. A policy on the use of restraint and comprehensive guidelines should be developed to guide health care practitioners in the management of patients where restraint cannot be avoided.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor University of Cape Town Research Committee and the Health Sciences Research Committee
Date 2016-11-10
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Survey/interview
Format text/html application/octet-stream text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/curationis.v39i1.1605
 
Source Curationis; Vol 39, No 1 (2016); 8 pages 2223-6279 0379-8577
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://curationis.org.za/index.php/curationis/article/view/1605/2056 https://curationis.org.za/index.php/curationis/article/view/1605/2055 https://curationis.org.za/index.php/curationis/article/view/1605/2057 https://curationis.org.za/index.php/curationis/article/view/1605/2052
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2016 Sebastiana Z. Kalula, Sabela G. Petros https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT