Does the offence of blasphemy have a future under the South African constitution?

HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Does the offence of blasphemy have a future under the South African constitution?
 
Creator van Rooyen, Kobus
 
Subject — —
Description This article reflects upon the question of whether the offence of blasphemy is valid in terms of the Constitution of the Republic which guarantees equal protection and freedom of religion, opinion, conscience and belie! Blasphemy protects only the Christian and Judaic perceptions of God. Would a Muslim, for example, not be entitled to protection under a broadened offence? And does the offence not discriminate against religions not protected by blasphemy? The author contends that Parliament has a duty to either broaden the scope of blasphemy or to scrap the offence. He is, however, of the view that the offence is not, in itself, unconstitutional and that Parliament should, given the sensitivities in this sphere, not scrap the offence but rather protect the religious convictions of all sections of the population.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 1995-12-11
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/hts.v51i4.1461
 
Source HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies; Vol 51, No 4 (1995); 1127-1113 2072-8050 0259-9422
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1461/2755
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 1995 Kobus van Rooyen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT