Shifting frontiers of transcendence in theology, philosophy and science

HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Shifting frontiers of transcendence in theology, philosophy and science
 
Creator du Toit, Cornelius W.
 
Subject — transcendence; frontiers of transcendence; filters of transcendence; transcendence in theology; transcendence in philosophy; transcendence in science; Kant and transcendence; Hegel and transcendence; Heidegger and transcendence
Description This article dealt cursorily with developments in theology, philosophy and the sciences that have contributed to what one might call horizontal transcendence. The premise is that humans have evolved into beings that are wired for transcendence. Transcendence is described in terms of the metaphor of frontiers and frontier posts. Although the frontiers of transcendence shift according to the insights, understanding and needs of every epoch and world view, it remains transcendent, even in its immanent mode. Diverse perceptions of that frontier normally coexist in every era and we can only discern a posteriori which was the dominant one. Frontiers are fixed with reference to the epistemologies, notions of the subject and power structures of a given era. From a theological point of view, encounter with the transcendent affords insight, not into the essence of transcendence, but into human self-understanding and understanding of our world. Transcendence enters into the picture when an ordinary human experience acquires a depth and an immediacy that are attributed to an act of God. In philosophy, transcendence evolved from a noumenal metaphysics focused on the object (Plato), via emphasis on the epistemological structure and limits of the knowing subject (Kant) and an endeavour to establish a dynamic subject-object dialectics (Hegel), to the assimilation of transcendence into human existence (Heidegger). In the sciences certain developments opened up possibilities for God to act in non-interventionist ways. The limitations of such an approach are considered, as well as promising new departures – and their limitations – in the neurosciences. From all of this I conclude that an immanent-transcendent approach is plausible for our day and age.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2011-04-11
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/hts.v67i1.879
 
Source HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies; Vol 67, No 1 (2011); 10 pages 2072-8050 0259-9422
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/879/1495 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/879/1816 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/879/1474 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/879/1484
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2011 Cornelius W. du Toit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT