Evaluation of commercial ELISA kits’ diagnostic specificity for FAST diseases in wild animals

Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Evaluation of commercial ELISA kits’ diagnostic specificity for FAST diseases in wild animals
 
Creator Milićević, Vesna Glišić, Dimitrije Veljović, Ljubiša Mirčeta, Jovan Kureljušić, Branislav Đorđević, Milutin Vasković, Nikola
 
Subject — diagnostic specificity; ELISA; foot-and-mouth disease; FAST diseases; surveillance; wild ruminants
Description Wild animals, sharing pathogens with domestic animals, play a crucial role in the epidemiology of infectious diseases. Sampling from wild animals poses significant challenges, yet it is vital for inclusion in disease surveillance and monitoring programmes. Often, mass surveillance involves serological screenings using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests, typically validated only for domestic animals. This study assessed the diagnostic specificity of commercially available ELISA tests on 342 wild ruminant serum samples and 100 from wild boars. We evaluated three tests for foot-and-mouth disease: two for Peste des petits ruminants, two for Rift Valley fever and one for Capripox virus. Diagnostic specificity was calculated using the formula True Negative/(False Positive + True Negative). Cohen’s kappa coefficient measured agreement between tests. Results showed high specificity and agreement across all tests. Specificity for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) ranged from 93.89% for Prionics to 100% for IDEXX, with IDvet showing 99.6%. The highest agreement was between FMD IDvet and IDEXX at 97.1%. Rift Valley fever (RVF) tests, Ingezim and IDvet, achieved specificities of 100% and 98.83%, respectively. The optimal specificity was attained by retesting single reactors and inactivating the complement.Contribution: Commercially available ELISA kits are specific for foot-and-mouth disease and similar transboundary animal diseases and can be used for highly specific wild animal testing.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor European Commission for Foot and Mouth Disease - EuFMD
Date 2024-06-28
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/ojvr.v91i1.2164
 
Source Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research; Vol 91, No 1 (2024); 7 pages 2219-0635 0030-2465
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://ojvr.org/index.php/ojvr/article/view/2164/2593 https://ojvr.org/index.php/ojvr/article/view/2164/2594 https://ojvr.org/index.php/ojvr/article/view/2164/2595 https://ojvr.org/index.php/ojvr/article/view/2164/2596
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2024 Vesna Milićević, Dimitrije Glišić, Ljubiša Veljović, Jovan Mirčeta, Branislav Kureljušić, Milutin Đorđević, Nikola Vasković https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT