Re-reading John 3:26–27: A comparative analysis of the politics of intolerance in Zimbabwe

HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Re-reading John 3:26–27: A comparative analysis of the politics of intolerance in Zimbabwe
 
Creator Mundenda, Dzikamai
 
Subject History intolerance; violence; Zimbabwe; politics; ethnical politics; Gospel of John; comparative analysis; socio-historical reading
Description The Gospel of John seems to show different thematic emphases that reveal socio-historical cultural tensions and a stressed community. The tensions between Jesus, the Pharisees and Jewish authorities, John and religious authorities, and John’s and Jesus’ disciples stressed the unsettled community. A disagreement existed on the divinity, identity and legitimacy of Jesus. The tensions bore character assassinations, name calling, denigration, crucifixion and tensions among followers. John 3:26–27 is an archetype of the friction. In the same vein, the independent and post-independent Zimbabwe exhibited political tensions, hate speech, denigration and violence since 1980. The tensions eroded confidence, unity and decision-making of the electorate. The violence and human rights abuses left visible trails of suffering and humiliations. The societal and political tension triggered unbecoming behaviours causing economic and ethical meltdown. This research seeks to unravel the mindset that aggravates violence to provide a reprieve theologically. The socio-historical reading juxtaposed with comparative analysis points to averting hate speech and songs that fuelled intolerance. According to this research, parochialism originates from citizens uniting behind promised futures and peace, a product of leaders participating in promoting peace. This unity helps propel tolerance, accountability and responsibility.Contribution: The study observes that citizens rally behind the promised future where leaders and ordinary citizens exhibit tolerance, accountability and responsibility. The leaders and the ordinary citizens can participate in amplifying intolerance, hate speech or character assassination. Vice versa, they can participate in controlling tensions and fights.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor N/A
Date 2023-12-22
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Comparative
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/hts.v79i4.9009
 
Source HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies; Vol 79, No 4 (2023); 7 pages 2072-8050 0259-9422
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/9009/26159 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/9009/26160 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/9009/26161 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/9009/26162
 
Coverage — Zimbabwe independence History
Rights Copyright (c) 2023 Dzikamai Mundenda https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT