Noise risk assessments within the adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies

Health SA Gesondheid

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Noise risk assessments within the adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies
 
Creator Rikhotso, Oscar Morodi, Thabiso J. Masekameni, Daniel M.
 
Subject Environmental Health (Occupational Health); Occupational hygiene administrative control; engineering control; cost-benefit analysis; precautionary principle; noise control; noise-induced hearing loss; occupational health and safety.
Description Background: The entire risk assessment process is fraught with methodological and technical uncertainties, exacerbated by the introduction in legislation of ambiguous technical terms such as adequately controlled and reasonably practicable. The combination of these factors renders the risk assessment process opaque regarding required employer actions for securing legal compliance within the noise risk assessment context.Aim: This study aims to evaluate how companies are applying and interpreting the adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies within the context of hearing conservation programmes (HCPs) and noise risk assessment processes.Setting: Four manufacturing and utilities companies.Methods: The four companies, selected through convenience sampling, submitted noise risk assessment records for evaluation through document analysis to determine the companies’ interpretation of the adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies.Results: In the reviewed noise risk assessment records, the adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies were poorly discerned. Specifically, the hierarchical approach for noise control outlined in the noise induced hearing loss regulations, for which the basis for adequately controlled philosophy ensues, remains misinterpreted by employers. Furthermore, cost-benefit analysis, which enables decision-making on the tolerability of risk within the reasonably practicable philosophy, was also omitted in the assessments.Conclusion: The adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies were poorly applied and interpreted by the participating companies, to the detriment of tangible noise control.Contribution: This study provides insights on company application and interpretation of the adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies, and HCPs, which contributes to inaction on noise control.
 
Publisher AOSIS Publishing
 
Contributor None
Date 2023-12-08
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Qualitative research
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/hsag.v28i0.2457
 
Source Health SA Gesondheid; Vol 28 (2023); 9 pages 2071-9736 1025-9848
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/view/2457/html https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/view/2457/epub https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/view/2457/xml https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/view/2457/pdf
 
Coverage Africa; South Africa; Gauteng; Pretoria Region, Pretoria West January 2021-December 2021 noise risk assessment records
Rights Copyright (c) 2023 Oscar Rikhotso, Thabiso J. Morodi, Daniel M. Masekameni https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT