A cross-cultural religiology between reductionism and anti-reductionism

HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies

 
 
Field Value
 
Title A cross-cultural religiology between reductionism and anti-reductionism
 
Creator Wang, Guicai
 
Subject — cross-cultural religiology; reductionism; anti-reductionism; a middle path; a holistic method; inter-religious understanding; dialogical dialogue; dialectical dialogue; practice; the other shore
Description ‘Religion’ has been subjected to two kinds of reduction: one from the various branches of religious studies, the other being the mutual ‘reduction’ among religions. We advocate a cross-cultural religiology and try to take a middle path between reductionism and anti-reductionism, responding to both kinds of reduction separately. As for the former reduction, we agree with a moderate reduction of religion by various religious disciplines on the one hand, and on the other hand, we propose to respect the religious whole as an integrate human activity, and try to learn to face and study religion with a holistic attitude and method. For the latter reduction, we propose three points to overcome the merely reductive cognitive approach in inter-religious understanding without falling into some kind of anti-intellectualism. Firstly, we insist that we should face the other religions with a pluralistic confidence without giving up understanding, and engage both ‘dialogical dialogue’ and ‘dialectical dialogue’ with other religions. Secondly, we advocate learning from the wisdom of Buddha, Confucius and Jesus, giving priority to practice, and being concerned about our most urgent life practice of the moment. Thirdly, we propose that cross-cultural research can be carried out thematically, which is exemplified with the author’s cross-cultural research on ‘the other shore’.Contribution: In the field of religious studies, there is constant dispute between reductionism and anti-reductionism. This article tries to place cross-cultural religiology between reductionism and anti-reductionism, avoid the debate between the two, emphasise the integrity of religion as a whole human activity, and propose some practical and usable methods for cross-cultural religiology, hoping to have some inspiration for academic colleagues.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2023-11-30
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/hts.v79i5.9278
 
Source HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies; Vol 79, No 5 (2023); 6 pages 2072-8050 0259-9422
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/9278/26015 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/9278/26016 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/9278/26017 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/9278/26018
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2023 Guicai Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT