The development of items for a physiotherapy clinical programme evaluation tool

South African Journal of Physiotherapy

 
 
Field Value
 
Title The development of items for a physiotherapy clinical programme evaluation tool
 
Creator Naidoo, Vaneshveri Stewart, Aimee V. Maleka, Morake E. Douglas
 
Subject — physiotherapy; clinical education; evaluation; focus group discussion; qualitative
Description Background: Evaluating a physiotherapy clinical education programme is challenging, given its complex and multidimensional nature, resulting in a paucity of research on the topic.Objectives: The objective of our study, which was part of a larger study, was to identify items that could be included in a tool to evaluate a physiotherapy clinical education programme in South Africa.Method: A qualitative study utilising focused group discussions including academics, clinical educators and clinicians was undertaken. A broad script that delved into clinical education experience was used. An inductive thematic content analysis using MaxQda version 2018.2 was undertaken; the data were coded, and similar foci were categorised and subcategorised. This process led to the identification of themes. Both triangulation of the data (member checks, field note comparison, observer reflection and verification of the data) and assuring the data’s trustworthiness (credibility, dependability and confirmability) were undertaken.Results: Fourteen focus group discussions were held countrywide. Three themes emerged from the data. A macro theme included all governance issues, a meso theme included all structural issues and a micro theme included all aspects related to clinical experience.Conclusion: The complex nature of clinical physiotherapy education and its diversity can be seen in these emerging themes. All the categories and subcategories making up these themes must now be considered in the next step of developing this tool.Clinical implications: Quality assurance and minimal training standards may be ensured.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor Physiotherapy academics Physiotherapy clinicians NRF Thuthuka Wits Faculty Research Funds South African Society of Physiotherapy
Date 2023-11-14
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1908
 
Source South African Journal of Physiotherapy; Vol 79, No 1 (2023); 5 pages 2410-8219 0379-6175
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/1908/3437 https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/1908/3438 https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/1908/3439 https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/1908/3440
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2023 Vaneshveri Naidoo, Aimee V. Stewart, Morake E. Douglas Maleka https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT