Methods and models in the quest for the historical Jesus: Historical criticism and/or social scientific criticism

HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Methods and models in the quest for the historical Jesus: Historical criticism and/or social scientific criticism
 
Creator van Aarde, Andries
 
Subject — —
Description In this article a distinction is made between social scientific criticism and historiography. Historiography describes what is unrepeatable, specific and particular. Social scientific criticism is to some extent a phenomenological approach. On a high level of abstraction, it focuses on ideal types. The historiographical quest for Jesus is about the plausibility of a continuity or a discontinuity existing between the Jesus of history and the Jesus of faith. This approach has been broadened by the interdisciplinary application of the results of archaeological, sociohistorical, and cultural anthropological studies of the world of the historical  Jesus. But it does not mean that historical-critical research as such is now dismissed. The aim of the article is to argue that social scientific criticism can complement a historical-critical analysis.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2002-12-17
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/hts.v58i2.562
 
Source HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies; Vol 58, No 2 (2002); 419-439 2072-8050 0259-9422
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/562/461
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2002 Andries van Aarde https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT