Evaluating postgraduate family medicine supervisor feedback in registrars’ learning portfolios

African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Evaluating postgraduate family medicine supervisor feedback in registrars’ learning portfolios
 
Creator Erumeda, Neetha J. George, Ann Z. Jenkins, Louis S.
 
Subject Family medicine; medical education; primary care decentralised training; family physician; feedback; individualised learning plan; learning portfolio; postgraduate supervision; mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise
Description Background: Postgraduate supervision forms a vital component of decentralised family medicine training. While the components of effective supervisory feedback have been explored in high-income countries, how this construct is delivered in resource-constrained low- to middle-income countries has not been investigated adequately.Aim: This article evaluated supervisory feedback in family medicine registrars’ learning portfolios (LPs) as captured in their learning plans and mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) forms and whether the training district or the year of training affected the nature of the feedback.Setting: Registrars’ LPs from 2020 across five decentralised sites affiliated with the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa were analysed.Methods: Two modified tools were used to evaluate the quantity of the written feedback in 38 learning plans and 57 mini-CEX forms. Descriptive statistics, Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for analysis. Content analysis was used to derive counts of areas of feedback.Results: Most learning plans (61.2%) did not refer to registrars’ clinical knowledge or offer an improvement strategy (86.1%). The ‘extent of supervisors’ feedback’ was rated as ‘poor’ (63.2%), with only 14.0% rated as ‘good.’ The ‘some’ and ‘no’ feedback categories in the mini-CEX competencies (p  0.001 to p = 0.014) and the ‘extent of supervisors’ feedback’ (p  0.001) were significantly associated with training district. Feedback focused less on clinical reasoning and negotiation skills.Conclusion: Supervisors should provide specific and constructive narrative feedback and an action plan to improve registrars’ future performance.Contribution: Supervisory feedback in postgraduate family medicine training needs overall improvement to develop skilled family physicians.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor Faculty Research Committee Individual Research Grants 2021
Date 2022-12-20
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Quantitative study
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3744
 
Source African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine; Vol 14, No 1 (2022); 10 pages 2071-2936 2071-2928
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/3744/5943 https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/3744/5944 https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/3744/5945 https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/3744/5946
 
Coverage Gauteng; North West; South Africa October - December 2020 Registrar learning portfolios
Rights Copyright (c) 2022 Neetha J. Erumeda, Ann Z. George, Louis S. Jenkins https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT