Corticosteroid therapy versus physiotherapy on pain, mobility and function in shoulder impingement: A short note

South African Journal of Physiotherapy

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Corticosteroid therapy versus physiotherapy on pain, mobility and function in shoulder impingement: A short note
 
Creator Benjamin-Damons, Natalie Hussein El Kout, Naeema A.R. van Bever Donker, Rogier Edwards, Tamsen Ferguson, Gillian
 
Subject Health; Physiotherapy; corticosteroid therapy shoulder pain; corticosteroid injections; physiotherapy; evidence statement; subacromial impingement syndrome
Description Background: The global estimate of shoulder pain is 67% and is often associated with subacromial impingement syndrome. Interventions include corticosteroid injection (CSI) therapy and physiotherapy. Further information is needed to compare the effect of these interventions on pain, joint range of motion (ROM) and shoulder function.Objectives: To summarise the best evidence comparing the effect of CSI versus physiotherapy on pain, shoulder ROM and shoulder function in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.Method: This evidence statement is based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of three randomised controlled trials (RCTs), namely, Rhon et al. (2014) (n = 136), Hay et al. (2003) (n = 207) and Van der Windt et al. (1998) (n = 109), with a total of 452 participants. A total of 14 studies were reviewed and only 3 studies met the inclusion criteria.Results: An improvement in shoulder function was found in favour of CSI at 6- to 7-week follow-up (p  0.0001), but no evidence was found for the superiority of CSI compared to physiotherapy for pain and ROM over 4–12 weeks. In 24 and 48 weeks, no evidence was found for the superiority of CSI compared to physiotherapy for shoulder function, pain or ROM.Conclusion: No evidence was found for the superiority of CSI compared to physiotherapy for pain and ROM in the short term besides an improvement in shoulder function in favour of CSI at 6–7 weeks. There was a weak recommendation with moderate quality of evidence based on three RCTs (2B).Clinical implications: This evidence statement may inform clinical practice when determining which intervention is best suited to manage patients with shoulder pain.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor South African Society of Physiotherapy Professional Development Portfolio
Date 2022-12-12
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Evidence based statement
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1794
 
Source South African Journal of Physiotherapy; Vol 78, No 1 (2022); 3 pages 2410-8219 0379-6175
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/1794/3113 https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/1794/3110 https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/1794/3111 https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/1794/3112
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2022 Natalie Benjamin-Damons, Naeema A.R. Hussein El Kout, Rogier van Bever Donker, Tamsen Edwards, Gillian Ferguson https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT