Patient preferences regarding the dress code, conduct and resources used by doctors during consultations in the public healthcare sector in Bloemfontein, Free State

South African Family Practice

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Patient preferences regarding the dress code, conduct and resources used by doctors during consultations in the public healthcare sector in Bloemfontein, Free State
 
Creator van der Merwe, J. W. Rugunanan, M. Ras, J. Röscher, E-M Henderson, B. D. Joubert, G.
 
Subject — dress-code; patient preferences; professional attire; professional behaviour; technology use
Description Background: The doctor–patient relationship is important in determining the quality of healthcare provided. This study aimed to identify patient preferences regarding dress code, conduct and resources used by doctors during consultations in the public healthcare sector, Bloemfontein. Information from this study can be of benefit in determining policies and dress codes within hospitals and medical schools.Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Self-administered anonymous questionnaires were distributed at Bloemfontein’s National District Hospital to patients 18 years and older, waiting in the pharmacy and consultation queues.Results: Of the 500 questionnaires distributed 410 were analysed. Patients preferred doctors to wear formal attire. For female doctors this included a neat blouse (77.9%), smart pants (62.5%) or straight-cut jeans (51.4%) and flat pumps (56.3%). Patients preferred male doctors to wear collared shirts (52.4% and 57.6% for long- and short-sleeved shirts, respectively) with smart pants (66.8%) or straight-cut jeans (45.9%), and smart shoes (70.3%). Patients did not condone eating and drinking by doctors during consultations; work-related calls were deemed acceptable. The use of technological resources was not preferred.Conclusion: Patients in the public healthcare sector prefer a formal, professional consulting environment that is determined largely by the doctor’s attire and conduct during the consultation.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2016-05-01
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/safp.v58i3.5666
 
Source South African Family Practice; Vol 58, No 3 (2016): May/June; 1 2078-6204 2078-6190
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/5666/7658
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2022 J. W. van der Merwe, M. Rugunanan, J. Ras, E-M Röscher, B. D. Henderson, G. Joubert https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT