Animism: Comparing Durkheim and Chidester’s analyses of EB Tylor’s theory of religion

HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Animism: Comparing Durkheim and Chidester’s analyses of EB Tylor’s theory of religion
 
Creator Strijdom, Johan M.
 
Subject Religious Studies; Sociology; Cultural Studies theories of religion; animism; comparison; EB Tylor; Durkheim; Chidester
Description The purpose of this research study was to compare the analyses of the anthropologist Edward Tylor’s animist theory of religion in the work of two major scholars of religion. At the beginning of the 20th century, Durkheim refuted Tylor’s classical explanation of the origin of religion, before he would proceed to develop his own sociological explanation. At the turn of the 21st century, from a postcolonial South African location, David Chidester offered a critical analysis of the triple mediation under colonial and imperial conditions that made Tylor’s evolutionary theory possible. By foregrounding definitions, making arguments explicit and comparing these two assessments, the two analyses shed light on each other as well as allowed us to view the issue of animism in a new light. This article concluded by highlighting points that emerged and need continuing attention in the academic study of religion.Contribution: This article, as part of a collection on re-readings of major theorists of religion, offers a comparison of Durkheim and Chidester’s analyses of Tylor’s classical animist theory of religion. By comparison, the analyses shed light on each other and on the theory of animism itself, highlighting critical issues that deserve the continuing focus of students of religion.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2021-07-30
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Historical Inquiry; Comparison
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/hts.v77i2.6717
 
Source HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies; Vol 77, No 2 (2021); 8 pages 2072-8050 0259-9422
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/6717/18784 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/6717/18785 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/6717/18786 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/6717/18787
 
Coverage South Africa; Britain; France Prehistoric; Colonial; Apartheid; Postcolonial —
Rights Copyright (c) 2021 Johan M. Strijdom https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT