Reshaping how we think about evaluation: A made in Africa evaluation perspective
African Evaluation Journal
| Field | Value | |
| Title | Reshaping how we think about evaluation: A made in Africa evaluation perspective | |
| Creator | Masvaure, Steven Motlanthe, Sonny M. | |
| Description | Background: The African development space is dominated by the Western hegemony that shapes the structural funding model, knowledge transfer and aid. Western hegemony defines the Western countries or development funders as superior to the aid receivers, without necessarily acknowledging the role of colonial history and racism that defined and influenced the underdevelopment of African countries. In the African context, the Global North uses liberalism as a tool to maintain hegemony; hence, there is no need to use colonial coercion as liberalism is self-reinforcing, self-legitimising and self-perpetuating. It absorbs counter-hegemony via its international institutions, economic interdependence and democracy.Objectives: This article examines how evaluation as a tool has perpetuated Western hegemony on the epistemological, axiological and ontological understanding of development in sub-Saharan Africa.Methods: The approach adopted in this article involved a traditional review of literature, analysis of tacit knowledge and personal experiences on evaluation practice in Africa.Results: Firstly, the article demonstrates that the theories and practice behind international development are based on colonial thinking and subjugation that permeate themselves throughout the conceptualisation, design and implementation and how results of development interventions are evaluated and viewed. Secondly, the article provides practical steps on how to decolonise international development and evaluations in Africa. The findings also show that evaluations should not be treated separately from the dominant forces that define international development. The evaluation field is a microcosm and an appendage of Western hegemonic influence on international development.Conclusion: The article concludes by advocating for the need to change the approach to international development and evaluation practice and emphasising the centrality of the worldviews and values of targeted populations by development interventions. | |
| Publisher | AOSIS | |
| Date | 2022-08-25 | |
| Identifier | 10.4102/aej.v10i1.618 | |
| Source | African Evaluation Journal; Vol 10, No 1 (2022); 9 pages 2306-5133 2310-4988 | |
| Language | eng | |
| Relation |
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:
https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/618/1122
https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/618/1123
https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/618/1124
https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/618/1125
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
