Decolonising and indigenising evaluation practice in Africa: Roadmap for mainstreaming the Made in Africa Evaluation approach

African Evaluation Journal

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Decolonising and indigenising evaluation practice in Africa: Roadmap for mainstreaming the Made in Africa Evaluation approach
 
Creator Dlakavu, Ayabulela Mathebula, Jabulani Mkhize, Samukelisiwe
 
Subject — decolonisation; decoloniality; development; evaluation; Made in Africa Evaluation (MAE); philosophy; ontology; epistemology; methodology
Description Background: Decolonisation is a concept that has taken on multiple layers since the end of colonisation and the onset of independence in the Global South. More than ever before, decolonialism, decoloniality and indigenisation have moved to the centre of intellectual inquiry across the broad spectrum of human activity: knowledge production, education, academic disciplines, professions, political life and economic organisation. The evaluation profession and fraternity has also been grappling with the idea of decolonising and indigenising its ontological, epistemological and methodological foundations, which are essentially rooted in the Global North development theory, practice and knowledge systems.Objectives: This article endeavours to provide recommendations on how to make the Made in Africa Evaluation (MAE) paradigm practical (applicable) for evaluators in Africa, based on decolonisation and indigenisation methodological prescriptions.Method: The study is qualitative by design, employing document analysis and the authors’ observation on development and evaluation practice in Africa and globally.Results: The emergent practice of evaluation is only experiencing decolonial scrutiny in the 21st century. In the African context, the MAE paradigm appears to be the continent’s decolonisation and indigenisation project for the evaluation fraternity.Conclusion: Building an Afrocentric, decolonised and indigenous MAE paradigm and approach requires a coordinated effort on building scholarship on the topic of MAE approaches and methodologies. Once there is sufficient documentation of the MAE approach, it should become easier to advance Afrocentric evaluation as mainstream discourse alongside the more established and neoliberal development and evaluation discourse.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2022-08-22
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/aej.v10i1.620
 
Source African Evaluation Journal; Vol 10, No 1 (2022); 10 pages 2306-5133 2310-4988
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/620/1110 https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/620/1111 https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/620/1112 https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/620/1113
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2022 Ayabulela Dlakavu, Jabulani Mathebula, Samukelisiwe Mkhize https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT