What is in a name? Does the difference between onto-theology and theo-ontology direct the way from eco-theology to theo-ecology? Specific Russian theological perspectives

Verbum et Ecclesia

 
 
Field Value
 
Title What is in a name? Does the difference between onto-theology and theo-ontology direct the way from eco-theology to theo-ecology? Specific Russian theological perspectives
 
Creator Buitendag, Johan
 
Subject Systematic Theology; Philosophical Theology; Theo-Ecology ontology; epistemology; ecology; ‘science & religion dialogue’; ‘faith seeking understanding’; ecotheology; Russian Silver Age; theo-ontology
Description I approach this venture of figuring out the correct terminology to understand reality through the prism of two distinctive Russian Orthodox theologians, Pavel Florensky (1882–1937) and Sergius Bulgakov (1871–1944). The lens I apply mainly to their works is their respective understanding of cosmology, that is, ontology and epistemology. Therefore, I concur with Grenz to abandon the term ‘onto-theology’ and qualify the inverse as a Trinitarian theo-ontology. This honours the intimate connection between knowing and being, and prevents the bifurcation between fidelity and rationality. Mutatis mutandis, the same applies to ‘eco-theology’. This inversion reminds one of Hans-Urs von Balthasar, who bartered the concept of an aesthetic theology for theological aesthetics. Turning this question around would advance our dialogue with the sciences as the common denominator of the discourse is rather nature (creation) discerned from an acknowledged a priori (as all cognition do). In other words, the term theo-ecology is proposed.Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: The purpose study is not ecological but rather an asyndetic use of the terminology about the science and religion dialogue, with reference to the nomenclature of ecology and theology. All observation terms and sentences are theory-laden. Religion can be viewed as a linguistic framework that shapes the entirety of life and thought. Truth claims should focus on the grammar (or rules of the game) and not the lexicon when expressive symbolism is employed. 
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor n/a
Date 2022-01-13
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Literary Analysis; Conceptual Formation
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/ve.v43i1.2400
 
Source Verbum et Ecclesia; Vol 43, No 1 (2022); 8 pages 2074-7705 1609-9982
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/2400/5467 https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/2400/5468 https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/2400/5469 https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/2400/5470 https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/downloadSuppFile/2400/1669
 
Coverage Universe Russian Silver Age; Postmodern Thinking n/a
Rights Copyright (c) 2022 Johan Buitendag https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT