The applicability of the UCLA loneliness scale in South Africa: Factor structure and dimensionality

African Journal of Psychological Assessment

 
 
Field Value
 
Title The applicability of the UCLA loneliness scale in South Africa: Factor structure and dimensionality
 
Creator Pretorius, Tyrone B.
 
Subject Psychology bifactor; COVID-19; loneliness; UCLA-LS3; reliability; South Africa
Description This study examines the generalisability of the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale Version 3 (UCLA-LS3) in a South African sample of young adults. In particular, it examined the normative data, reliability, and factor structure of this scale. The participants were young adults (N = 337) who were randomly sampled from a university population and they responded to the UCLA Loneliness Scale. It was found that the sample had higher loneliness scores than those reported in the literature, potentially suggesting that loneliness may be a significant mental health concern amongst this group. Women reported higher levels of loneliness than men. Reliability analysis (Cronbach’s alpha) and analysis of the influence of individual items on the mean, variance, and alpha demonstrated that UCLA-LS3 had highly satisfactory internal consistency in the sample. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test four conceptualisations of the factor structure of UCLA-LS3: a one-factor model, a correlated three-factor model, a bifactor model with two subscales, and a bifactor model with three subscales. Notably, CFA demonstrated that the two bifactor models are a better fit than the one-factor and correlated three-factor models and that the bifactor model with three subscales is marginally a better fit than the bifactor model with two subscales. Ancillary bifactor analysis confirmed the dimensionality of the scale as sufficient variance was accounted for by the three subscales, after the variance attributable to the total scale was partitioned out. Therefore, UCLA-LS3 is best conceptualised as comprising of three subscales (isolation, relational connectedness, collective connectedness), in addition to a total scale.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2022-01-10
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/ajopa.v4i0.63
 
Source African Journal of Psychological Assessment; Vol 4 (2022); 8 pages 2617-2798 2707-1618
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://ajopa.org/index.php/ajopa/article/view/63/264 https://ajopa.org/index.php/ajopa/article/view/63/265 https://ajopa.org/index.php/ajopa/article/view/63/266 https://ajopa.org/index.php/ajopa/article/view/63/267
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2022 Tyrone B. Pretorius https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT