Congruent ethos in the Second Temple literature of the Old Testament

HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Congruent ethos in the Second Temple literature of the Old Testament
 
Creator Venter, Pieter M.
 
Subject Old Testament Ethics Ethics; Second Temple literature; inclusivistic; exclusivistic
Description Proposing the term ‘congruent ethos’ for studying Old Testament ethics, this article indicates (in line with existing research) that opposing ethical viewpoints are found in the Old Testament. The modus operandi followed was firstly to compare the penitential prayer in Daniel 9:4–19 with those in Ezra 9:6–15 and Nehemiah 9:6–37. This comparison shows that the phenomenon of conflicting ethics was present in Yehud during the Second Temple period. Whilst the Daniel text reflects a more universal attitude, the penitential prayers in Ezra and Nehemiah propose a nationalist view of God and an exclusivist identity for Israel. Although Daniel can be dated later than Ezra-Nehemiah, the tendency to juxtapose an exclusivist viewpoint with an inclusivist one was already present in the earlier period of the Second Temple. This is evidenced by the literature of Isaiah 56–66, Ruth, Jonah, Esther, Tobit, Judith and even Joshua.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2011-04-11
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Literature study
Format text/html text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/hts.v67i1.965
 
Source HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies; Vol 67, No 1 (2011); 13 pages 2072-8050 0259-9422
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/965/1577 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/965/1582 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/965/1504
 
Coverage Ancient Near East Second temple period (516 BCE - 70 CE) Conflicting ethics
Rights Copyright (c) 2011 Pieter M. Venter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT