Investigating selective media for optimal isolation of Brucella spp. in South Africa

Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Investigating selective media for optimal isolation of Brucella spp. in South Africa
 
Creator Ledwaba, Maphuti B. Ndumnego, Okechukwu C. Matle, Itumeleng Gelaw, Awoke K. van Heerden, Henriette
 
Subject — Bovine brucellosis; selective media; Bacterial isolation
Description Bovine brucellosis in South Africa is caused mainly by Brucella abortus biovar (bv.) 1 and less frequently by B. abortus bv. 2. Bacterial isolation is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis of Brucella species; however, it is not very sensitive. The aim of this study was to determine the selective medium with optimum antibiotic composition that will allow the growth of Brucella species (spp.) while inhibiting moulds, yeast and most, if not all, Gram-negative contaminants in South Africa. In the controlled experiment, modified Agrifood Research and Technology Center of Aragon (CITA) medium (mCITA) seemed to be the optimum selective medium for isolation of Brucella spp. as compared with Farrell’s medium (FM) and modified Thayer Martin (mTM), while FM inhibited the growth of most fungal and bacterial contaminants. Mean comparison between the three media used to culture B. abortus resulted in lower mean difference ranging from 0 to 2.33. In case of Brucella ovis, high mean difference was obtained when comparing FM with mCITA (10.33) and mTM (12). However, the mean differences of 0.67 and 1.67 were obtained when comparing mCITA and mTM media used to, respectively, culture pasteurised and raw milk spiked with B. ovis. Further optimisation at the Agricultural Research Council – Onderstepoort Veterinary Research Institute resulted in a comparable performance between FM and mCITA; however, mCITA allowed optimal growth of the fastidious B. ovis, which is generally inhibited on FM. Generally, mCITA seemed to be the optimum selective medium for isolation of Brucella spp., while FM inhibits the growth of most fungal and bacterial contaminants. Thus, veterinary laboratories can use mCITA and/or FM but should take into consideration the detection of factious Brucella isolated in the country or region.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development National Research Foundation University of Pretoria Bacteriology Section, ARC-OVR
Date 2020-03-04
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/ojvr.v87i1.1792
 
Source Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research; Vol 87, No 1 (2020); 9 pages 2219-0635 0030-2465
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://ojvr.org/index.php/ojvr/article/view/1792/2083 https://ojvr.org/index.php/ojvr/article/view/1792/2082 https://ojvr.org/index.php/ojvr/article/view/1792/2084 https://ojvr.org/index.php/ojvr/article/view/1792/2081
 
Coverage Gauteng Province; South Africa — bovine serum and milk
Rights Copyright (c) 2020 Maphuti B. Ledwaba, Okechukwu C. Ndumnego, Itumeleng Matle, Awoke K. Gelaw, Henriette van Heerden https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT