Illegible handwriting and other prescription errors on prescriptions at National District Hospital, Bloemfontein

South African Family Practice

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Illegible handwriting and other prescription errors on prescriptions at National District Hospital, Bloemfontein
 
Creator Brits, H Botha, A Niksch, L Terblanché, R Venter, K Joubert, G
 
Subject — digital pen; errors; handwriting; prescriptions; reading
Description Background: It is generally accepted that doctors have illegible handwriting. The writer usually knows what is written, but other parties often have problems with reading and interpreting.

Aim: The aim of the study was to determine whether illegible doctors’ handwriting and other factors that can lead to dispensing errors occur on prescriptions at National District Hospital.

Method: In part one the prescriptions of 20 doctors were read by five doctors, nurses and pharmacists to detect who could read it most accurately. In part two, these doctors were asked to write a prescription with an IntelliPen®.

Results: From the 300 measurements, 88% of the doctors read the prescriptions correctly, compared with 82% of the nurses and 75% of the pharmacists. A potential fatal error was lorazepam injection 4 mg, which was read as 40 mg (lethal dose) by 20% of healthcare workers (HCWs). With the IntelliPen® only 39% of the prescriptions were readable. Only 65% of prescribers could be identified from their handwriting or the name stamp used.

Conclusion: Pharmacists read the prescriptions worst and they are the people who must dispense the prescriptions. Some of the reading mistakes were critical and could be lethal. Many of the prescriptions did not meet the legal requirement for prescriptions.

(Full text of the research articles are available online at www.medpharm.tandfonline.com/ojfp)

S Afr Fam Pract 2017; DOI: 10.1080/20786190.2016.1254932
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2017-03-06
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article —
Format application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/safp.v59i1.4658
 
Source South African Family Practice; Vol 59, No 1 (2017): January/February; 50 2078-6204 2078-6190
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/4658/5518
 
Coverage — — —
ADVERTISEMENT