Ultrasound biosafety: Knowledge and opinions of health practitioners who perform obstetric scans in South Africa

Health SA Gesondheid

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Ultrasound biosafety: Knowledge and opinions of health practitioners who perform obstetric scans in South Africa
 
Creator Mashiane, Salome van Dyk, Barbara Casmod, Yasmin
 
Subject — Obstetric ultrasound; ultrasound bioeffects; safety indices and principles; acoustic output
Description Background: Diagnostic ultrasound is generally considered as a safe test in pregnancy. To date there is no evidence that ultrasound has caused harm to the developing foetus. However, with the number of obstetric scans on the rise and the steep increase in acoustic output achieved by modern machines, the lack of evidence of absolute safety remains a concern. Acoustic output is under the direct control of the operator and is therefore the operator’s responsibility to keep the intensity as low as reasonably achievable. A situation analysis in the South African context was deemed necessary to determine end user knowledge and opinions on safe antenatal ultrasound practice.Aim: The aim of this quantitative descriptive, cross-sectional study was to evaluate the knowledge and practice of health practitioners who perform antenatal scans regarding safety aspects of diagnostic ultrasound.Setting: A self-administered questionnaire was distributed at two national congresses, hosted by the South African Society of Ultrasound and Obstetrics (SASUOG) and South African Society of Obstetricians (SASOG) committees.Method: Quota non-probability sampling allowed for the identification of professional categories capable of providing information relevant to the study objectives. The sample represented a population with experience in obstetric ultrasound.Results: Compared to international studies, South African end users demonstrated better knowledge of safety indices than their international counterparts. It is, however, discouraging that end users still demonstrate insufficient knowledge regarding factors contributing to adverse biological effects.Conclusion: With room for improvement, an effort should be made to comply with international standards through increased training efforts and raising awareness.
 
Publisher AOSIS Publishing
 
Contributor
Date 2019-10-17
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/hsag.v24i0.1028
 
Source Health SA Gesondheid; Vol 24 (2019); 11 pages 2071-9736 1025-9848
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/view/1028/html https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/view/1028/epub https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/view/1028/xml https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/view/1028/pdf
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Salome Mashiane, Barbara van Dyk, Yasmin Casmod https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT