1 & 2 Kronieke as ’n magsteks

HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies

 
 
Field Value
 
Title 1 & 2 Kronieke as ’n magsteks
 
Creator Geyser, A. B.
 
Subject — —
Description 1 & 2 Chronicles – a discourse of powerThis study compares Chronicles with its source documents. It is obvious that the authors of Chronicles omitted certain parts of the source documents on the other hand on the other emphasized certain aspects with a specific purpose. The result is that the Southern kingdom receives a positive evaluation, while the Northern kingdom is described in a negative light. David is presented as the ideal king and in contrast to Exodus is credited as the founder of the religious cult. The cult in Jerusalem is legitimized and proclaimed as the only true religion. In so doing the books of Chronicles without a doubt secured and legitimized the position and actions of the temple personnel. As long as the temple existed it functioned as a discourse of power within this community. As a discourse of power, it set boundaries and excluded different groups that were traditionally part of the people of YHWH. The destruction of the temple though, disempowered this text and opened up the way for it to become part of the Hebrew canon.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2006-09-17
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/hts.v62i2.370
 
Source HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies; Vol 62, No 2 (2006); 473-500 2072-8050 0259-9422
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/370/268
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2006 A. B. Geyser https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT