Theory and practice in the use of merger remedies: Considering South African experience

Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Theory and practice in the use of merger remedies: Considering South African experience
 
Creator Robb, Genna Ngwenya, Avias
 
Subject merger; remedy; behavioural; structural; South Africa
Description There has been considerable debate internationally around the relative advantages and disadvantages of structural and behavioural remedies. In mergers which raise competition concerns, prohibition or divestiture may prevent merger efficiencies from being realised, and therefore behavioural remedies may seem attractive. However, these can prove difficult or impossible to enforce in practice. The merger approval rates of the South African competition authorities are in line with the practice of international agencies, but the number of behavioural remedies imposed is relatively high. This paper briefly considers the international literature on merger remedies before analysing South African merger decisions and making a comparison with other jurisdictions. It then presents a review of a decision made by the Tribunal in the merger between Astral Foods and National Chick in 2001, which was approved with both structural and behavioural conditions. Finally, the paper draws conclusions for the design of remedies in future.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2011-08-31
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion —
Format application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/jef.v4i3.374
 
Source Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences; Vol 4, No 3 (2011); 203-220 2312-2803 1995-7076
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/374/455
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2018 Genna Robb, Avias Ngwenya https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT