Comparative joint position error in patients with non-specific neck disorders and asymptomatic age-matched individuals

South African Journal of Physiotherapy

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Comparative joint position error in patients with non-specific neck disorders and asymptomatic age-matched individuals
 
Creator Quartey, Jonathan Ernst, Markus Bello, Ajediran Oppong-Yebaoah, Bertha Bonney, Emmanuel Acquaah, Kow Asomaning, Felix Foli, Margaret Asante, Sandra Schaemann, Astrid Bauer, Christoph
 
Subject — joint position error; proprioceptive; neck disability; age-matched; neck disability index; sex-matched
Description Background: Neck pain is a common complaint worldwide and ranked seventh in 2010 as the cause of ‘years lived with disability’ in Ghana. Proprioceptive dysfunction, measured by joint position error (JPE) tests, indicates an association with neck pain frequency, dizziness and balance problems in patients.Objectives: To examine proprioceptive deficits of the neck using a laser pointer attached to the head.Methods: Twenty patients within the age group 21–60 years, with at least five points on the neck disability index (NDI), and 20 age- and sex-matched controls with less than five points on the NDI were recruited for this study. The JPE was determined wearing a headlight laser pointer directed towards a Cartesian coordinate system adjusted to x/y = 0/0, placed on a wall after returning from left and right rotation, flexion and extension. From starting in an upright sitting position, facing the Cartesian coordinate system, each participant performed five repetitions for each movement direction. The mean of five repetitions for each movement direction was calculated as absolute error (AE), constant error (CE) and variable error (VE).Results: Control participants showed larger JPE values for nearly all AE, CE and VE. After repositioning from flexion controls showed an approximately 0.6 ° larger median JPE, and the opposite for extension, with median differences between 1 ° and 2 °.Conclusion: The results of this study do not reveal any meaningful differences between patients with mild disabled neck movement compared with controls.Clinical implications: Joint position error testing does not seem useful for patients with mild neck disability.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2019-06-27
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip application/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajp.v75i1.568
 
Source South African Journal of Physiotherapy; Vol 75, No 1 (2019); 7 pages 2410-8219 0379-6175
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/568/1650 https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/568/1649 https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/568/1651 https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/568/1648
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Jonathan Quartey, Markus Ernst, Ajediran Bello, Bertha Oppong-Yeboah, Emmanuel Bonney, Kow Acquaah, Felix Asomaning, Margaret Foli, Sandra Asante, Astrid Schaemann, Christoph Bauer https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT