Dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the syndesmosis ligamentous complex and clear space in acute ankle injury, compared to magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings

SA Journal of Radiology

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the syndesmosis ligamentous complex and clear space in acute ankle injury, compared to magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings
 
Creator van Niekerk, Chantelle van Dyk, Barbara
 
Subject Radiology; ultrasound; musculo-skeletal acute ankle injury; syndesmotic clear space measurement; MSK ultrasound
Description Background: Syndesmosis injuries are often more serious than an injury to the lateral ligament complex of the ankle, with double the recovery time, chronic discomfort and joint instability. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered as the best imaging modality to assess the integrity of the syndesmotic ligamentous complex and clear space, a dynamic ultrasound evaluation may provide an alternative imaging option worthy of exploring.Aim: The aim of this article is to compare the sensitivity and specificity of musculoskeletal ultrasound and MRI, in the diagnosis of syndesmosis pathology, with surgical findings as the reference point.Method: MRI was performed on 114 participants presenting with pain over the lateral aspect of the ankle after injury. This was followed by a dynamic ultrasound examination during which the anterior tibiofibular ligament (ATiFL) was assessed for continuity, contour and haematoma. The tibiofibular clear space was measured with the ankle in a neutral position, followed by internal and external rotation.Results: The Fisher’s exact test was used to determine non-random associations between variables and compute statistical significance (p 0.05). Ultrasound achieved a sensitivity of 86.3%, specificity of 97% with a false-positive rate of 3%. The sensitivity of MRI is similar to that of ultrasound (86%) with a specificity of 100%.Conclusion: Although both imaging tests performed very well, MRI was slightly better at excluding pathology while both tests performed equally in demonstrating pathology. As a simple, inexpensive and reproducible test, dynamic ultrasound can thus be considered as an alternative to MRI in acute ankle pathology.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor University of Johnnesburg, Supervisor linked bursary.
Date 2017-09-29
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — A quantitative, comparative descriptive study using a quota non-probability sampling method
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajr.v21i1.1191
 
Source South African Journal of Radiology; Vol 21, No 1 (2017); 8 pages 2078-6778 1027-202X
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajr.org.za/index.php/sajr/article/view/1191/1596 https://sajr.org.za/index.php/sajr/article/view/1191/1597 https://sajr.org.za/index.php/sajr/article/view/1191/1598 https://sajr.org.za/index.php/sajr/article/view/1191/1595
 
Coverage South Africa, Moot Hospital, Pretoria 2013 - 2015 Patients who present with pain over the lateral aspect of the ankle after an injury and were referred for MRI will be offered an additional ultrasound examination by the researcher at no additional cost to the patient
Rights Copyright (c) 2017 Chantelle van Niekerk, Barbara van Dyk https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT