Revisiting decoloniality for more effective research and evaluation

African Evaluation Journal

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Revisiting decoloniality for more effective research and evaluation
 
Creator Cloete, Fanie Auriacombe, Christelle
 
Subject Public Management; Public Governance; Evaluation; Political Studies decoloniality; decolonisation; culturally responsive research; culturally responsive evaluation; Africa-rooted evaluation
Description Background: There is increasing global resistance against a perceived Eurocentric value hegemony in knowledge generation, implementation and evaluation. A persistent colonial value mindset is accused of imposing outdated and inappropriate policies on former colonised and other countries and needs to be changed to more appropriate processes and results to improve conditions in those countries in the 21st century.Objectives: This article intends to summarise some lessons from the impact of historical colonial value systems and practices in current knowledge generation, transfer and application processes and results in Africa (especially in South Africa). The objective is to identify concrete directions towards ‘decolonising’ research and evaluation processes and products to be more relevant, appropriate and, therefore, more effective to achieve sustainable empowerment and other desired developmental outcomes not only in lesser developed countries but also in traditionally more developed Western nations.Method: A comparative literature review was undertaken to identify and assess the current state of the debate on the perceived need to decolonise research and evaluation practices in different contexts. The Africa-rooted evaluation movement was used as a case study for this purpose.Results: The current decoloniality discourse is ineffective and needs to be taken in another direction. Mainstreaming culturally sensitive and responsive, contextualised participatory research and evaluation designs and methodology implementation in all facets and at all stages of research and evaluation projects has the potential to fulfil the requirements and demands of the research and evaluation decoloniality movement.Conclusion: This will improve the effectiveness of research and evaluation processes and results.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor University of Johannesburg
Date 2019-06-24
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Literary Analysis
Format text/html application/epub+zip application/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/aej.v7i1.363
 
Source African Evaluation Journal; Vol 7, No 1 (2019); 10 pages 2306-5133 2310-4988
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/363/590 https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/363/589 https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/363/591 https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/363/588
 
Coverage Africa; global 21st Century —
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Fanie Cloete, Christelle Auriacombe https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT