Amos: ’n teologie van bedreiging?
In die Skriflig
| Field | Value | |
| Title | Amos: ’n teologie van bedreiging? | |
| Creator | Helberg, J. L. | |
| Description | The book of Amos contains many undertones of threat, except in the epilogue which, according to many scholars, is redactional The question thus comes to the fore whether this characteristic implies that God is seen by Amos as a God of threat for whom one can only have fear. This article, however, points out Amos’ moral justification of God's deeds. Israel's actions, on the other hand, display a self-centredness and a lack of theocentric and personal approach. Within this framework the history of salvation, especially the exodus and the conquest of the land, as well as the election, covenant and the idea of the remnant, is fossilised and God is made a captive of space, time and relations. However, Amos' proclamation implies that in reality God cannot be made captive - neither of such a religion nor of a theology of threat. Amos envisions a situation in which everything will comply with the real aim set for it/him. | |
| Publisher | AOSIS | |
| Date | 1998-06-13 | |
| Identifier | 10.4102/ids.v32i3.1648 | |
| Source | In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi; Vol 32, No 3 (1998); 349-364 2305-0853 1018-6441 | |
| Language | eng | |
| Relation |
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:
https://indieskriflig.org.za/index.php/skriflig/article/view/1648/1946
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
