Echt gebeurd? Verhalen of feiten? Over historische en literaire bijbelkritiek en de zeggenschap van de bijbel
Verbum et Ecclesia
| Field | Value | |
| Title | Echt gebeurd? Verhalen of feiten? Over historische en literaire bijbelkritiek en de zeggenschap van de bijbel | |
| Creator | Vroom, HM | |
| Description | A serious objection against Christian faith is that the Bible is not trustworthy because the history it relates does not correspond to the facts of history. In theology this problem is “solved” by some biblical scholars by an acceptance of the research methods that are used for all literature alike while others accept the historical critique by understanding the biblical history as a faithful but a-historical revelation. Fundamentalists reject the historical-critical objections and stress the inerrancy of Scripture. In this contribution these three “answers” are rejected: biblical studies shall take the (real) facts serious indeed (pace inerrancy), nor jump into an a-historical revelatory history next to historical criticism (pace strong Barthian views in the “Amsterdam School”), but neither read religious scriptures all in the same way “as all literature” — but apply academic methods as is appropriate for the Hebrew and Greek Bible. | |
| Publisher | AOSIS | |
| Date | 2007-11-17 | |
| Identifier | 10.4102/ve.v28i1.111 | |
| Source | Verbum et Ecclesia; Vol 28, No 1 (2007); 345-371 2074-7705 1609-9982 | |
| Language | eng | |
| Relation |
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:
https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/111/85
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
