Motivational theory and knowledge sharing in the public service

South African Journal of Information Management

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Motivational theory and knowledge sharing in the public service
 
Creator Mosala-Bryant, Nthabiseng N. Hoskins, Ruth G.
 
Subject information management; public administration; library and information science; human resource management motivation theory; knowledge sharing; public service; communities of practice; PHRDF
Description Background: Knowledge sharing has been identified as the core process of knowledge management for institutions which are interested in the retention of knowledge invested in their human capital in the event of their departure from the institutions. To this end, knowledge sharing has been the focus of research institution-wide, and less focus has been paid to communities of practice (CoPs) within the South African public service.Objectives: This study aimed to explore factors that motivated knowledge sharing practices in a South African public service CoP.Method: This study used the mixed methods design through the lens of the motivational theory. Primary quantitative data were collected by means of self-administered questionnaires returned by 23 of the 31 KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Provincial Human Resource Development Forum (PHRDF) members to whom the questionnaires were distributed. In addition, primary qualitative data were collected from the senior managers of Human Resource Development (HRD) units from 10 different KZN Provincial Departments of the 14 managers requested. The quantitative analysis was established using SPSS software, whereas qualitative analysis was established using thematic codes with the NVIVO software.Results: The findings from the results revealed that PHRDF members were intrinsically motivated to share their knowledge rather than extrinsically motivated.Conclusion: Although literature confirmed the main barrier to knowledge sharing in organisations as being the unwillingness to share, CoPs were likely to reduce the extent to which knowledge sharing was hindered. Members of a CoP ultimately related to one another as homogeneous groups despite representing different departments. To this end, hedonic intrinsic motivation occurred as members shared knowledge for the good of the whole regardless of the absence of extrinsic motivation. Departmental silos fell away, and there was no anticipation of rewards or incentives for knowledge sharing. It is, therefore, imperative that the South African public service strategically positions CoPs as knowledge sharing platforms to curb the loss of knowledge when employees leave its employ for whatever reason.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor N/A
Date 2017-05-23
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Survey/interview, Litrature Review, Qualitative and Quantitaive methods
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajim.v19i1.772
 
Source SA Journal of Information Management; Vol 19, No 1 (2017); 9 pages 1560-683X 2078-1865
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajim.co.za/index.php/sajim/article/view/772/1058 https://sajim.co.za/index.php/sajim/article/view/772/1057 https://sajim.co.za/index.php/sajim/article/view/772/1059 https://sajim.co.za/index.php/sajim/article/view/772/1055
 
Coverage South Africa Dubai; Puerto Rico; Malaysia; China age; gender; ethnicity; religion; education
Rights Copyright (c) 2017 Nthabiseng N. Mosala-Bryant, Ruth G. Hoskins https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT