Performance evaluation of tuberculosis smear microscopists working at rechecking laboratories in Ethiopia

African Journal of Laboratory Medicine

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Performance evaluation of tuberculosis smear microscopists working at rechecking laboratories in Ethiopia
 
Creator Asrat, Habtamu Kebede, Abebaw Abebe, Abnet Meaza, Abyot Hailu, Getinet Desale, Adinew Gashu, Andargachew Kassa, Wondwossen Mekonnen, Tesfaye Abose, Ebisea Girmachew, Feven Yenealem, Dereje Mulugeta, Achamyeleh Ayana, Gonfa Desta, Kassu
 
Subject — Quality; acid-fast bacilli microscopy; external quality assessment; level of agreement
Description Background: Tuberculosis is an infectious disease caused by the bacillus Mycobacterium tuberculosis. According to the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health’s 2013–2014 report, the tuberculosis case detection rate was 53.7%, which was below the target of 81% set for that year.Objective: This study assessed the performance of tuberculosis smear microscopists at external quality assessment rechecking laboratories in Ethiopia.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at 81 laboratories from April to July 2015. Panel slides were prepared and validated at the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory. The validated panel slides were used to evaluate the performance of microscopists at these laboratories compared with readers from the reference laboratory.Results: A total of 389 external quality assessment rechecking laboratory microscopists participated in the study, of which 268 (68.9%) worked at hospitals, 241 (62%) had more than five years of work experience, 201 (51.7%) held Bachelors degrees, and 319 (82%) reported tuberculosis smear microscopy training. Overall, 324 (83.3%) participants scored ≥ 80%. Sensitivity for detecting tuberculosis bacilli was 84.5% and specificity was 93.1%. The overall percent agreement between participants and reference readers was 87.1 (kappa=0.72). All 10 slides were correctly read (i.e., scored 100%) by 80 (20.6%) participants, 156 (40.1%) scored 90% – 95%, 88 (22.6%) scored 80% – 85% and 65 (16.7%) scored below 80%. There were 806 (20.7%) total errors, with 143 (3.7%) major and 663 (17%) minor errors.Conclusion: The overall performance of participants in reading the slides showed good agreement with the reference readers. Most errors were minor, and the ability to detect tuberculosis bacilli can be improved through building the capacity of professionals.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2017-04-21
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/ajlm.v6i1.590
 
Source African Journal of Laboratory Medicine; Vol 6, No 1 (2017); 6 pages 2225-2010 2225-2002
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/590/843 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/590/842 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/590/844 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/590/838
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2017 Habtamu Asrat, Abebaw Kebede, Abnet Abebe, Abyot Meaza, Getinet Hailu, Adinew Desale, Andargachew Gashu, Wondwossen Kassa, Tesfaye Mekonnen, Ebisea Abose, Feven Girmachew, Dereje Yenealem, Achamyeleh Mulugeta, Gonfa Ayana, Kassu Desta https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT