Record Details

Item difficulty analysis of a high-stakes mathematics examination using Rasch analysis: The case of sequences and series

Pythagoras


 
 
Field Value
 
Title Item difficulty analysis of a high-stakes mathematics examination using Rasch analysis: The case of sequences and series
 
Creator Jacobs, Mark; Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cape Peninsula University of Technology Mhakure, Duncan; Numeracy Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa Fray, Richard L.; Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of the Western
Cape Holtman, Lorna; Postgraduate Studies, University of the Western Cape Julie, Cyril; School of Science and Mathematics Education, University of the Western Cape
 
Subject Mathematics Education; Education; Mathematics Sequences and series; High-stakes examination; Item difficulty; Rasch; Discrimination index
Description The National Senior Certificate examination is the most important school examination in South Africa. Analysis of learners’ performance in Mathematics in this examination is normally carried out and presented in terms of the percentage of learners who succeeded in the different bands of achievement. In some cases item difficulties are presented – item refers to the subsection of each examination question. Very little attention is paid to other diagnostic statistics, such as the discrimination indices and item difficulties taking into consideration partial scores examinees achieve on items. In this article we report on a study that, in addition to the usual item difficulties, includes a discrimination index of item difficulties taking into account partial scores examinees achieved. The items, considered individually, are analysed in relation to the other items on the test. The focus is on the topic sequences and series and the data were obtained from a stratified sample of the marked scripts of the candidates who wrote the National Senior Certificate examination in Mathematics in November 2010. Rasch procedures were used for the analysis. The findings indicate that learners perform differently on subsections of topics, herein referred to as items, and that focusing on scores for full topics potentially mask these differences. Mathematical explanations are attempted to account for difficulties learners exhibit in these subsections, using a hierarchy of scale. The findings and our analysis indicate that a form of measurement-driven testing could have beneficial results for teaching. Also, for some items the difficulty obtained from the work of examinees runs counter to the commonly perceived wisdom that an examination ought to be structured in such a way that the less difficult items are at the start of a topic. An explanatory device anchored around the construct of ‘familiarity with problem types through repeated productive practice’ is used to account for the manifested hierarchy of difficulty of the items.
 
Publisher AOSIS Publishing
 
Contributor National Research Foundation, SA under Grant number 77941
Date 2014-05-21
 
Type — textual analysis; grounded theory;diagnostic statistics
Format text/html application/octet-stream text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/pythagoras.v35i1.220
 
Source Pythagoras; Vol 35, No 1 (2014); 7 pages
 
Language en
 
Coverage Western Cape Province South Africa South African Matriculation Mathematics Examination 2010 stratified sample (12%) of marked scripts of matriculants of Western Cape provinceSouth African High schools mixed gender and ethnicity; ages in range 17-25 years
Rights Copyright information Ownership of copyright in terms of the Work remains with the authors.The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the Work, provided attribution is given to the place and detail of original publication, as set out in the official citation of the Work published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the Work on the authors’ or their institutions’ websites or institutional repository.Publication and user license The authors grant the title owner and the publisher an irrevocable license and first right and perpetual subsequent right to (a) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the Work in  any form/medium, (b) to translate the Work into other languages, create adaptations, summaries or extracts of the Work or other derivative works based on the Work and exercise all of the rights set forth in (a) above in such translations, adaptations, summaries, extracts and derivative works, (c) to license others to do any or all of the above, and (d) to register the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for the Definitive Work.The authors acknowledge and accept the user licence under which the Work will  be published as set out in http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/za/legalcode (Creative Commons Attribution License South Africa)The undersigned warrant that they have the authority to license these publication rights and that no portion of the copyright to the Work has been assigned or licensed previously to any other party.Disclaimer: The publisher, editors and title owner accept no responsibility for any statement made or opinion expressed by any other person in this Work. Consequently, they will not be liable for any loss or damage sustained by any reader as a result of his or her action upon any statement or opinion in this Work. In cases where a manuscript is NOT accepted for publication by the editorial board, the portions of this agreement regarding the publishing licensing shall be null and void and the authors will be free to submit this manuscript to any other publication for first publication.Our copyright policies are author-friendly and protect the rights of our authors and publishing partners.