Record Details

Vulture rescue and rehabilitation in South Africa: An urban perspective

Journal of the South African Veterinary Association


 
 
Field Value
 
Title Vulture rescue and rehabilitation in South Africa: An urban perspective
 
Creator Naidoo, V.; Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort, 0110 South Africa. Wolter, K.; Rhino and Lion Wildlife Conservation Non-profit Organisation, Skeerpoort, South Africa.

De Wildt Cheetah and Wildlife Trust, De Wildt, South Africa. Espie, I.; The National Zoological Gardens of South Africa,
Pretoria, South Africa. Kotze, A.; The National Zoological Gardens of South Africa,
Pretoria, South Africa.

Department of Genetics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
 
Subject — —
Description SouthAfrica is home to 9 vulture species, of which 7 are endangered. While the cause of the population declines remains largely speculative, a vast amount of effort has been dedicated towards the protection of populations by ensuring sustainable and safe food sources for the various colonies. Limited focus was placed in the past on efforts related to the rescue and/or rehabilitation (R&R) of injured birds and the release of these birds back into the wild. This paper provides an overview of the causes, the impact and success of 3 organisations involved in R&R efforts of vultures in the Magaliesberg mountain range and surrounding areas over a period of 10 years. Study material included 162 Cape griffon (CGV) and 38 African white-backed (AWBV) vultures. Datasets include the number, sex and age of birds received, the reason the vultures were brought in for R&R, surgical interventions performed and outcomes of rescue efforts. The CGV dominated the rehabilitation attempts. Results further show that a large number of apparently healthy birds were presented for veterinary treatment. The R&R data clearly indicate that the major cause of injuries was birds colliding with overhead pylons, as a high number of soft tissue and skeletal injuries were observed. The study also shows that successful releases of rescued birds are possible. It is concluded that urbanisation has had a major negative impact on vultures around the Magaliesberg mountain range.
 
Publisher AOSIS Publishing
 
Contributor
Date 2011-04-13
 
Type — —
Format application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/jsava.v82i1.64
 
Source Journal of the South African Veterinary Association; Vol 82, No 1 (2011); 24-31
 
Language en
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright information Ownership of copyright in terms of the Work remains with the authors. The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the Work, provided attribution is given to the place and detail of original publication, as set out in the official citation of the Work published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the Work on the authors’ or their institutions’ websites or institutional repository. Disclaimer: The publisher, editors and title owner accept no responsibility for any statement made or opinion expressed by any other person in this Work. Consequently, they will not be liable for any loss or damage sustained by any reader as a result of his or her action upon any statement or opinion in this Work. In cases where a manuscript is NOT accepted for publication by the editorial board, the portions of this agreement regarding the publishing licensing shall be null and void and the authors will be free to submit this manuscript to any other publication for first publication. Our copyright policies are author-friendly and protect the rights of our authors and publishing partners.