Record Details

A survey of the prevalence of blowfly strike and the control measures used in the Rûens area of the Western Cape Province of South Africa

Journal of the South African Veterinary Association


 
 
Field Value
 
Title A survey of the prevalence of blowfly strike and the control measures used in the Rûens area of the Western Cape Province of South Africa
 
Creator Scholtz, A. J.; Institute for Animal Production: Elsenburg, Private Bag X1, Elsenburg, 7607 South Africa.

Centre for Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300 South Africa. Cloete, S. W. P.; Institute for Animal Production: Elsenburg, Private Bag X1, Elsenburg, 7607 South Africa.

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7599 South Africa. du Toit, E.; Institute for Animal Production, Tygerhoek Research Farm, PO Box 25, Riviersonderend, 7250 South Africa. van Wyk, J. B. de K van der Linde, T. C.; Department of Zoology and Entomology, PO Box 339, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, 9300 South Africa.
 
Subject — —
Description Blowfly strike and the methods used to combat blowfly strike were recorded on 33 properties in the Rûens area of South Africa during 2003/2004. Data were recorded on Merino and Dohne Merino hoggets (n = 4951) with at least 3 months’ wool growth. The following data were captured: presence or absence of strike, site of the strike (body or breech), presence or absence of dermatophilosis as well as subjective scores for wool quality and wool colour. Control measures recorded include: chemical treatment (preventative and spot treatment), crutching, mulesing and the use of the Lucitrap® system. Blowfly strike was not significantly influenced by gender or breed. Hoggets suffering from dermatophilosis were more likely to be struck, compared with contemporaries not suffering from the skin disorder (0.057 vs 0.027; P < 0.05). Merino hoggets generally had higher scores than their Dohne Merino contemporaries for wool quality (32.6 vs 27.4; P<0.05) and wool colour (29.0 vs 27.2; P<0.05). There was an indication that the Lucitrap® system may have reduced flystrike, but the effect was not statistically significant (P = 0.19 for overall strikes and P = 0.12 for body strike). The Mules operation benefited overall flystrike (0.013 vs 0.110; P < 0.05); mainly through an effect on breech strike (0.010 vs 0.109; P < 0.05). The proportion of fly strikes increased with wool length, and declined with an increase in farm size in wool colour score. None of the ethically acceptable control measures assessed could substantially reduce blowfly strike on their own, and an integrated pest management programme was proposed.
 
Publisher AOSIS Publishing
 
Contributor
Date 2011-04-11
 
Type — —
Format application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/jsava.v82i2.43
 
Source Journal of the South African Veterinary Association; Vol 82, No 2 (2011); 107-115
 
Language en
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright information Ownership of copyright in terms of the Work remains with the authors. The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the Work, provided attribution is given to the place and detail of original publication, as set out in the official citation of the Work published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the Work on the authors’ or their institutions’ websites or institutional repository. Disclaimer: The publisher, editors and title owner accept no responsibility for any statement made or opinion expressed by any other person in this Work. Consequently, they will not be liable for any loss or damage sustained by any reader as a result of his or her action upon any statement or opinion in this Work. In cases where a manuscript is NOT accepted for publication by the editorial board, the portions of this agreement regarding the publishing licensing shall be null and void and the authors will be free to submit this manuscript to any other publication for first publication. Our copyright policies are author-friendly and protect the rights of our authors and publishing partners.