Management of progressive joint disorders by non-physician healthcare providers in South Africa: A mapping study to inform pharmacist integration

African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Management of progressive joint disorders by non-physician healthcare providers in South Africa: A mapping study to inform pharmacist integration
 
Creator Modau, Tumelo Constantinou, Demitri Orchard, Ané
 
Subject Family medicine, rheumatology; primary health care, multidisciplinary care allied health professionals; interprofessional collaboration; musculoskeletal; pharmacist integration; referral pathways; rehabilitative healthcare providers
Description Background: Progressive joint disorders (PJDs), including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are leading causes of disability worldwide. Early multidisciplinary intervention is critical; however, delayed non-pharmacological management, fragmented referral pathways and limited integration of pharmacists, despite their potential role in medication management and early ‘red flag’ identification, remain common.Aim: To identify which PJDs are managed by which healthcare providers, to inform pharmacist referral pathways and promote integrated care.Setting: Non-physician healthcare providers (HCPs) in South Africa, including physiotherapists, occupational therapists, chiropractors, podiatrists, osteopaths, biokineticists and other complementary therapy providers.Methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was administered via REDCap® and distributed by professional bodies through email and professional association platform advertisements. Descriptive statistics and quantitative content analysis assessed condition management, referral practices and collaboration.Results: A total of 266 HCPs participated. Osteoarthritis (91.7%) and RA (84.6%) were the most managed conditions. High interprofessional collaboration was noted with physiotherapists (71.4%) and limited with pharmacists (23.3%). Most providers (76.3%) did not require referral letters. Referrals to and from other providers were common, but incoming referrals varied by profession. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach’s α 0.70).Conclusion: Progressive joint disorders were predominantly managed by chiropractors, physiotherapists and biokineticists. Referral pathways were inconsistent, and pharmacist integration remained limited.Contribution: This study presents the first national mapping of non-physician roles in PJD management in South Africa, providing critical insights for future development of pharmacist-inclusive referral guidelines.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2026-05-11
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Survey
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/phcfm.v18i1.5281
 
Source African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine; Vol 18, No 1 (2026); 15 pages 2071-2936 2071-2928
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/5281/9272 https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/5281/9273 https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/5281/9274 https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/5281/9275
 
Coverage South Africa; Africa 2022-2025 >18; all; all; rehabilitative/non-medical healthcare providers and Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM)
Rights Copyright (c) 2026 Tumelo Modau, Demitri Constantinou, Ané Orchard https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT