Professionalising state-owned enterprise boards: A skills-based framework for competence-driven governance

Advances in Corporate Governance

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Professionalising state-owned enterprise boards: A skills-based framework for competence-driven governance
 
Creator Mutenda, Ernest K.
 
Subject Public Administration; Corporate Governance; State-Owned Enterprises; Public Sector Reform; Board Governance; Public Accountability; Political Appointments; Governance Frameworks; Skills-Based Governance; Institutional Integrity; Comparative Public Manage state-owned enterprises (SOEs); board governance; depoliticisation; professionalisation; skills matrix; corporate governance reform; public accountability; merit-based appointments.
Description Background: State-owned enterprises (SOEs) continue to play a critical role in public service delivery and economic development across many countries. But their performance is often constrained by weaknesses in board composition and governance. In South Africa, sustained under performance at several SOEs has been linked to the appointment of directors who lack adequate financial expertise, governance competence, ethical leadership and sector-specific knowledge required for effective oversight.Aim: This article re-centres the governance reform debate on the professionalisation of SOE boards. It proposes a skills and qualifications matrix as a structural mechanism for embedding competence, accountability and sector-specific expertise into board appointment processes.Setting: The review draws primarily on South African governance reform experiences, with insights applicable to state-led governance systems in emerging economies undergoing institutional restructuring.Methods: A thematic review of governance literature, policy documents and professional body frameworks was conducted, with particular attention to post-State Capture reform agendas. Normative governance principles, regulatory gaps and institutional case evidence were synthesised to develop a pragmatic reform framework.Results: The review identifies a persistent disconnect between current appointment practices and the technical demands of SOE governance. It demonstrates that the inclusion of certified professionals such as chartered accountants, ethics and compliance practitioners, and sector-specific experts can strengthen board integrity, oversight and public trust when supported by enabling legal and institutional reforms.Conclusion: The proposed skills and qualifications matrix offers a practical tool for promoting merit-based, accountable and professional SOE board appointments.Contribution: The article advances a governance-centred, politically informed framework for reforming SOEs in South Africa and comparable contexts where politicised appointments undermine public value.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2026-02-16
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Conceptual article; Narrative review; Comparative analysis; Policy analysis; Framework development; Normative synthesis
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/acg.v3i1.30
 
Source Advances in Corporate Governance; Vol 3, No 1 (2026); 11 pages 3078-2252
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://goodgovernancejournal.org/index.php/acg/article/view/30/102 https://goodgovernancejournal.org/index.php/acg/article/view/30/103 https://goodgovernancejournal.org/index.php/acg/article/view/30/104 https://goodgovernancejournal.org/index.php/acg/article/view/30/105
 
Coverage South Africa; Brazil; China; New Zealand; Singapore; United Kingdom; Global South; Emerging Economies 2010–2025; Post-State Capture Era; Contemporary Governance Reform Period State-owned enterprises; National governance frameworks; Public policy documents; Comparative case studies; Institutional reform reports; Professional body guidelines; South Africa; Brazil; China; New Zealand; Singapore; United Kingdom
Rights Copyright (c) 2026 Ernest K. Mutenda https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT