Ethical apologies or image repair? Evaluating corporate accountability in South Africa’s private sector

Advances in Corporate Governance

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Ethical apologies or image repair? Evaluating corporate accountability in South Africa’s private sector
 
Creator Mutenda, Ernest K.
 
Subject Business Ethics; Corporate Governance; Communication Studies; Public Relations; Crisis Management corporate apology; business ethics; crisis communication; reputational management; ethical accountability; South African corporations
Description Background: Corporate apologies have become standard in reputational crisis management, yet their ethical depth is frequently questioned. In South Africa, scandals involving Tiger Brands, Steinhoff, and Eskom-linked firms have spotlighted corporate responses amid public scrutiny.Objectives: This article investigates whether corporate apologies issued in these high-profile cases reflect genuine ethical accountability or function primarily as strategic tools for reputation protection.Method: A qualitative multiple-case article approach was adopted, using discourse and content analysis to examine corporate apology statements, media coverage and public disclosures. A custom Ethical Apology Evaluation Rubric grounded in deontology, consequentialism and virtue ethics was applied to assess eight core criteria across each case.Results: Findings reveal consistent patterns of partial apologies, strategic ambiguity and limited ethical restitution. While companies such as McKinsey showed moderate engagement by returning illicit fees and reforming internal processes, others such as Steinhoff and Trillian avoided moral responsibility entirely. The rubric allowed semi-quantitative comparisons across cases, highlighting gaps in moral leadership and stakeholder accountability.Conclusion: Corporate apologies in these cases were largely reactive, reputationally driven, and legally cautious, falling short of ethical standards outlined in normative theory.Contribution: This article offers a replicable ethical apology assessment tool and argues for the institutionalisation of ethically grounded apology frameworks in corporate crisis management within post-State Capture South Africa.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor Adv. Mlandu Kona Mr. Nqobezitha Hluzani Mr. Andile Mnyaka Ms Eulender Mudau
Date 2025-10-16
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Qualitative research; Case study; Content analysis; Discourse analysis; Normative ethical evaluation
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/acg.v2i1.15
 
Source Advances in Corporate Governance; Vol 2, No 1 (2025); 10 pages 3078-2252
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://goodgovernancejournal.org/index.php/acg/article/view/15/61 https://goodgovernancejournal.org/index.php/acg/article/view/15/62 https://goodgovernancejournal.org/index.php/acg/article/view/15/63 https://goodgovernancejournal.org/index.php/acg/article/view/15/64
 
Coverage South Africa 2015–2025 Not applicable (publicly available corporate and media data used; no human participants)
Rights Copyright (c) 2025 Ernest K. Mutenda https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT