The predictive value of risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism on gynaecological cancer patients

Journal of the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa

 
 
Field Value
 
Title The predictive value of risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism on gynaecological cancer patients
 
Creator Ratshabedi, Phuti Khomotso Chikandiwa, Admire Mbodi, Langanani
 
Subject Gynaecology Cancers risk assessment models; Caprini score; Padua score; Khorana score; venous thromboembolism; gynaecological cancers
Description Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a multifactorial disease. There are two main clinical entities that are associated with morbidity and mortality, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Our study aimed to compare the three risk assessment models (RAMs), Khorana, Caprini and Padua in terms of predicting VTE in gynaecologic oncology patients.
Methods: Patients were retrospectively scored according to Caprini, Padua and Khorana scoring models to assess the risk for VTE. Accuracy analysis of risk assessment models was performed using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values as well as the area under the curve of each model per patient.
Results: The Caprini score has good sensitivity (80.0), a poor specificity (24.3), low positive predictive value (7.2) and good negative predictive value (94.3) (95% CI). The Khorana score has a poor sensitivity (30.0), a fair specificity (62.5), low positive predictive value (5.6) and good negative predictive value (92.4) (95% CI). The Padua score has an average sensitivity (60.0), a poor specificity (42.6), low positive predictive value (7.1) and good negative predictive value (93.5) (95% CI). The Caprini score had the overall best performance.
Conclusion: Caprini score performed better and proved to be the best score. It has the potential to reduce mortality associated with VTE in gynaecological cancer patients. However, the Caprini score needs to be tested in the same population in a prospective study in a multicentre.
Contribution: The results of this study prove to us that Caprini score is the best to be used in a South African setting.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor University of Witwatersrand Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital Obstetrics and Gynaecology department
Date 2025-08-05
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — retrospective review
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/jcmsa.v3i1.164
 
Source Journal of the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa; Vol 3, No 1 (2025); 6 pages 2960-110X 3105-4331
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://jcmsa.org.za/index.php/jcmsa/article/view/164/676 https://jcmsa.org.za/index.php/jcmsa/article/view/164/677 https://jcmsa.org.za/index.php/jcmsa/article/view/164/678 https://jcmsa.org.za/index.php/jcmsa/article/view/164/679
 
Coverage Africa; South Africa; Gauteng; Johannesburg 2019 female
Rights Copyright (c) 2025 Phuti Khomotso Ratshabedi, Admire Chikandiwa, Langanani Mbodi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT