Frameworks used to evaluate community-based rehabilitation interventions: A scoping review

African Journal of Disability

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Frameworks used to evaluate community-based rehabilitation interventions: A scoping review
 
Creator Manig, Sarah M. Ennion, Liezel Rowe, Michael de Witte, Luc
 
Subject Community-based Rehabilitation community-based rehabilitation; evaluation; framework; scoping review; theoretical framework; impact assessment; rehabilitation evaluation.
Description Background: Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) interventions are important for improving the well-being of people with disabilities. However, there is no universally accepted framework for evaluating these interventions, which limits their effectiveness and integration into policy.Objectives: To explore theoretical frameworks used in evaluating CBR interventions, assessing their suitability, context-specific applicability and cultural relevance.Method: A scoping review methodology was employed to examine the literature. Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, EBSCOhost and Web of Science. Broad search terms and keywords used were CBR, analytical and/or methodological and/or theoretical and/or conceptual and/or evaluation framework, impact and evaluation. Only full-text articles written in English and published between 2000 and 2020 were included. Data were analysed using a narrative synthesis method.Results: No single framework has been widely recognised as the superior or most effective standard for evaluating CBR interventions. Instead, a combination of the CBR matrix and CBR guidelines was frequently used and adapted to be context-specific.Conclusion: While cultural relevance and context specificity are recognised as essential to the evaluation process – and measuring outcomes at the individual level is viewed as most appropriate – there remains a need for a certain level of standardisation.Contribution: The study highlights the need for context-specific and culturally relevant evaluation frameworks for CBR interventions, including appropriate outcome measures and/or evaluation instruments.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor South African Society of Physiotherapy
Date 2025-07-30
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Systemetised Review
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1546
 
Source African Journal of Disability; Vol 14 (2025); 6 pages 2226-7220 2223-9170
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/view/1546/3515 https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/view/1546/3516 https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/view/1546/3517 https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/view/1546/3518
 
Coverage Global 2020-2022 —
Rights Copyright (c) 2025 Sarah M. Manig, Liezel Ennion, Michael Rowe, Luc de Witte https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT