It’s not just about the cash: The impact of conservation-based employment on human well-being

Koedoe - African Protected Area Conservation and Science

 
 
Field Value
 
Title It’s not just about the cash: The impact of conservation-based employment on human well-being
 
Creator Swemmer, Louise K. Buthelezi, Innocent Buthelezi, Kutullo M. Marshall, Thembi Morale, Kgaugelo Uys, Mari-Tinka Twine, Wayne C. Swemmer, Anthony M.
 
Subject Conservation, social ecology constituency; employment; environmental monitor; conservation-related benefits; psychological well-being; protected area; sustainability.
Description Employment is a sought-after conservation-based benefit. The national Environmental Monitor (EM) programme was established in 2013 to address challenges of unemployment and biodiversity conservation adjacent to and inside South African protected areas (PAs). We used qualitative and quantitative methods to interview 109 EMs working in the Kruger to Canyons Biosphere Region, an area encompassing 72 PAs including the Kruger National Park, to document the positive and negative, tangible and intangible impacts of their jobs at an individual, family and community level. We recorded an extensive list of material (e.g. monetary income, improved health and shelter) and psychological well-being impacts (improved self-esteem, empowerment and personal image). Our findings highlight the role of learning new things and having positive social connections in the workplace. We suggest that positive workplace well-being is important for organisational sustainability in the conservation sector and has a role to play in reducing wildlife crime.
Conservation implications: Understanding workplace well-being in the conservation sector is important not only for ensuring benefit flow by facilitating personal, family and community well-being, but also for enhancing productivity through increased performance and organisational citizenship behaviour. These findings have direct implications for people and wildlife globally in the context of increasing pressure for PAs to demonstrate their societal contributions, while financial resources for PA management decrease and the illegal use of wildlife inside parks is increasingly becoming a threat to both biodiversity and people.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor Mari-Tinka Uys Kruger to Canyon Biosphere
Date 2025-03-31
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Questionnaires
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/koedoe.v67i1.1808
 
Source Koedoe; Vol 67, No 1 (2025); 13 pages 2071-0771 0075-6458
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1808/3444 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1808/3445 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1808/3446 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1808/3448 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1808/3449 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1808/3447
 
Coverage South Africa 2015 partial count
Rights Copyright (c) 2025 Louise K. Swemmer, Innocent L. Buthelezi, Kutullo M. Buthelezi, Thembi Marshall, Kgaugelo Morale, Mari-Tinka Uys, Wayne C. Twine, Anthony M. Swemmer https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT