Minimising inhaled corticosteroids for COPD

African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Minimising inhaled corticosteroids for COPD
 
Creator Heran, Benji Perry, Thomas L. Bassett, Ken
 
Subject Family medicine; primary care; primary health care inhaled steroids; corticosteroids; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; chronic obstructive airways disease; primary care; therapeutics
Description This Therapeutic Letter considers the evidence for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as a treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Drug therapy aims to alleviate symptoms, enhance functional capacity and prevent exacerbations, but has not consistently shown to reduce mortality or improve quality of life based on randomised trials.Inhaled corticosteroids have shown limited benefits for COPD symptoms and exacerbations but increased risks of serious harms. Guidelines recommend limiting ICS to severe COPD and only for repeated exacerbations. Studies show withdrawing ICS can be done safely for stable COPD patients with infrequent exacerbations, especially those with lower eosinophil counts. Provincial, national and international guidelines now recommend limiting ICS prescriptions to severe COPD stages. Long-term ICS use may lead to serious side effects, including pneumonia and fractures. Initial COPD therapy should focus on short-acting bronchodilators, not ICS. Adding long-acting bronchodilators is recommended before considering ICS because of limited benefits and risks of serious harms. For persistent symptoms, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) or long-acting beta2 agonists (LABA) are recommended, with the addition of ICS reserved for those with repeated exacerbations and severe COPD. Deprescribing ICS can be considered in clinically stable patients, particularly for those with infrequent exacerbations and mild COPD. When applicable, tapering ICS over several months is advised for patients with elevated eosinophil counts. Overall, the risks of serious harms from ICS typically outweigh their limited benefits for mild COPD patients in primary care.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor The Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care at Stellenbosch university provided funding for the project.
Date 2024-12-18
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Review
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4756
 
Source African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine; Vol 16, No 1 (2024); 3 pages 2071-2936 2071-2928
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/4756/7822 https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/4756/7823 https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/4756/7824 https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/4756/7825
 
Coverage Africa September 2024 —
Rights Copyright (c) 2024 Benji Heran, Thomas L. Perry, Ken Bassett https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT