Evaluation process use in the University Capacity Development Programme at Walter Sisulu University, South Africa

African Evaluation Journal

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Evaluation process use in the University Capacity Development Programme at Walter Sisulu University, South Africa
 
Creator Mantshongo, Mandla Mapitsa, Caitlin B.
 
Subject Education; Monitoring and Evaluation field evaluation use; process use; Walter Sisulu University; higher education; University Capacity Development Programme; monitoring and evaluation.
Description Background: The higher education (HE) policy framework identifies funding inter alia as one of the steering mechanisms, for the transformation of HE in South Africa. However, the role of monitoring and evaluation (ME) in facilitating this transformation is still emerging. While the instrumental use of evaluation findings is common, research on how process use can also play a critical role in facilitating sector change is missing.Objectives: The study investigated the use of process evaluations in enhancing the performance of the University Capacity Development Grant in a previously disadvantaged institution in the Eastern Cape province.Method: Purposive sampling was used as a method to select the participants. The case study design, interpretive paradigm and qualitative methods approach were adopted, and data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews, focus groups and document review. The study sampled 17 participants, including the Department of Higher Education and Training officials, the University Capacity Development Programme (UCDP) management and two staff focus groups.Results: If process use is to be strengthened, the evaluation process must be highly adaptable to specific programmatic circumstances and organisational contexts.Conclusion: Evaluation process use, in its practical form, must go beyond issues of participation from an individual perspective and include organisational and stakeholder management for effective implementation.Contribution: The study’s results are pivotal as they would assist different organisations worldwide that are running similar projects as the UCDP but have not yet understood the benefits that would be obtained by key stakeholders involved in an evaluation process.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor Walter Sisulu University research office
Date 2024-10-08
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Qualitative method; interpretive paradigm; case study design; Semi-strucctured interveiws; focus groups; document analysis
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/aej.v12i1.755
 
Source African Evaluation Journal; Vol 12, No 1 (2024); 12 pages 2306-5133 2310-4988
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/755/1528 https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/755/1529 https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/755/1530 https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/755/1531
 
Coverage — — 18-61; Both Males and females; All Africans
Rights Copyright (c) 2024 Mandla Mantshongo, Caitlin B. Mapitsa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT