Pleistocene ichnological geoheritage in national parks on the Cape coast

Koedoe - African Protected Area Conservation and Science

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Pleistocene ichnological geoheritage in national parks on the Cape coast
 
Creator Helm, Charles W. Carr, Andrew S. Cawthra, Hayley C. De Vynck, Jan C. Lockley, Martin G. Dixon, Mark G. Rust, Renee Stear, Willo Thesen, Guy H.H. van Berkel, Ferdi Venter, Jan A.
 
Subject Ichnology; Conservation; Palaeoanthropology aeolianite; vertebrate tracksite; graffiti; hominin; palaeoenvironment; palaeoanthropology; ranking.
Description Aeolianites and cemented beach deposits on South Africa’s Cape coast preserve evidence of events that transpired on them when they were composed of unconsolidated sand. Over the past decades, numerous Pleistocene vertebrate tracksites have been identified on aeolianite palaeosurfaces in the Garden Route National Park, West Coast National Park, and Addo Elephant National Park. In the Garden Route National Park alone, 57 Pleistocene vertebrate tracksites have been discovered. An equilibrium exists, whereby new sites become exposed through cliff-collapse events, while known sites slump into the ocean, are eroded through the action of wind and water, or are destroyed through wave action. Engraved graffiti poses a further threat. These sites complement the traditional body fossil record, and have significant palaeoenvironmental and palaeoanthropological implications. Hominin sites are of global importance: one contains the oldest tracks attributed to Homo sapiens, others contain patterns made in sand by ancestral humans and constitutes a form of early palaeoart. Collectively, these sites have substantial geoheritage value. The discoveries create management questions: which sites require active management, and how should they be ranked in importance? Factors which need to be considered in developing a management strategy include the scientific and heritage value of the sites, whether recovery or replication is preferable, the presence or absence of suitable repositories, the level of the threat to site integrity, the accessibility of the site, and the feasibility of recovery. Checklists containing appropriate criteria and questions can form tools in assessing the importance of these ichnosites.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor n/a
Date 2024-08-30
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Survey
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/koedoe.v66i2.1786
 
Source Koedoe; Vol 66, No 2 (2024); 12 pages 2071-0771 0075-6458
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1786/3378 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1786/3379 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1786/3380 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1786/3381
 
Coverage Cape coast, protected areas Pleistocene Epoch Vertebrate ichnosites, species diversity, hominin ichnology
Rights Copyright (c) 2024 Charles W Helm, Andrew S Carr, Hayley C Cawthra, Jan C De Vynck, Martin G Lockley, Mark G Dixon, Renee Rust, Willo Stear, Guy H H Thesen, Fred Van Berkel, Jan A Venter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT